Sound Transit委員會於2022年7月28日確定了West Seattle Link擴展項目的首選方案並且於2023年3月23日確定了Ballard Link擴展項目的首選方案。如需了解詳情，請查看2022年7月的新聞稿與委員會動議，以及2023年3月的新聞稿與委員會動議。Sound Transit員工正在努力更新此網站，以反映最新的委員會動議。

歡迎

關於本項目

West Seattle/Ballard Link擴展項目將為整個密集的住宅和就業中心，提供快速、可靠的輕軌連接。此外，新建的Downtown Seattle輕軌隧道將提高運輸效能，以達致整個區域更有效地運作。此兩項獨立的輕軌擴展項目屬於2016年11月，獲選民批准的區域配套措施的一部分。

West Seattle Link 擴展項目
- 從Downtown Seattle到 West Seattle 的 Alaska Junction 社區，增設4.7 英里的輕軌服務。
- 其中包括由 SODO 到 Alaska Junction四個新設的車站。
Ballard Link 擴展項目
- 從Downtown Seattle到 Ballard 增設7.1 英里的輕軌服務，以及一條新建的Downtown Seattle輕軌專用隧道。
- 其中包括由 CID唐人街/國際區到 Market Street九個新設的車站。

關於本項目

經過 2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 2 月這段時間的進一步研究，Sound Transit 委員會確定了 Ballard Link 擴展項目的首選方案。我們正努力在網站上更新項目資訊，以反映最新的委員會動議。同時，請閱讀委員會動議與新聞稿。

概述

2019年，Sound Transit委員會在 《環境影響報告草案》 (Environmental Impact Statement, EIS)中確定了首選方案及其他需要研究的備選方案，該草案於2022年1月28日公佈，隨後有90天的公眾評議期。《環境影響報告草案》評估了備選方案為自然和人造環境以及交通運輸系統帶來的潛在影響和效益，並確定了潛在的緩解措施。

在審查了《環境影響報告草案》以及來自部落、公眾及機構合作夥伴的意見後，Sound Transit委員會確定了West Seattle Link擴展項目的首選方案，並要求對Ballard Link擴展項目進行進一步研究。閱讀我們的新聞稿以及委員會動議，進一步了解Sound Transit委員會的行動。

在預計於2023年底公佈的《環境影響報告終案》中，Sound Transit將針對在《環境影響報告草案》評議期收到的評論作出回應。在公佈《環境影響報告終案》後，委員會將選擇即將建設的項目。草案的機構和公眾意見總結報告對評議主題進行概述，其中附有收到的所有意見的附錄。

West Seattle和Ballard Link擴展項目將為整個密集的住宅和就業中心，提供快速、可靠的輕軌連接。

項目時間表

2016年選民批准

2017年至2023年進行規劃

研發備選方案
ST委員會推出首選方案
《環境影響報告草案》
ST委員會修改了West Seattle Link擴展項目的首選方案
ST委員會確認或修改了Ballard Link擴展項目的首選方案
《環境影響報告終案》
ST委員會落實建設項目
聯邦交通運輸局(FTA)發出決議紀錄

2023年至2026年（West Seattle擴展項目）及2024年至2027年（Ballard擴展項目）設計階段

採購最終設計和工程合約
取得土地使用權和施工許可證
展開物業併購 / 搬遷過程
公共事業預先搬遷 / 前期工程合約

2026年至2032年（West Seattle擴展項目）及2026年至2039年*（Ballard擴展項目）建設階段

拆除和清理必要的建築，以興建和營運輕軌區段。
土方工程，例如雨水系統、柱基、擋土牆和隧道
軌道和車站的建設
持續與受工程影響單位進行溝通
安全教育
測試和準備階段

2032年（West Seattle擴展項目）及2037-2039*年（Ballard擴展項目）投入服務

*Ballard Link 擴展項目：最新預測 Ballard Link 擴展項目的負擔能力缺口約18 億美元。為實現 2037 年交付目標，Sound Transit希望透過提高地區、州和聯邦機構的資金和贊助，以彌補項目負擔能力的缺口。同時， Sound Transit 委員會將採納由合作夥伴和公衆提出的調整方案，以減低項目的成本。如果無法彌補此缺口，根據目前Sound Transit的財務負擔能力預測，Smith Cove站將於2037年率先投入服務， Ballard站則於2039 年才開始營運。了解更多重新調整的詳情。

An image of the West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions project map that displays the preferred alternatives and other alternatives we are currently evaluating. The map also includes station locations, and describes if an alternative is elevated, in a tunnel or at-grade. — 正處於評估階段的首選方案和其他備選方案。

了解有關備選方案的更多資訊

請選擇以下的區段檢視路線和車站方案，以及《環境影響報告草案》備選方案的前期比較。

Interbay/Ballard
South Interbay
Downtown
Chinatown-International District
SODO
Duwamish
Delridge/West Seattle Junction

環境評審期間的公平性和包容性

Sound Transit致力於讓項目沿線地區的社區參與其中，努力使有色人種社區和低收入群融入公眾參與的過程。在進行環境評審過程期間，Sound Transit將進行環境公義分析，此內容將納入《環境影響報告草案》中。該分析將包括：

描述項目沿線地區的人口結構。
評估此項目是否會對有色人種和低收入人群造成失衡的影響。
考量潛在的項目效益，例如提高了接觸機會的概率。
記錄我們在規劃過程中，努力融入有色人種和低收入人群的參與，以及透過拓展工作所收集的意見。

隨著《環境影響報告草案》的環境公義分析、Sound Transit和 City of Seattle 的合作，已在每個規劃階段應用種族公平工具包 (Racial Equity Toolkit, RET)，包括先前的備選方案開發階段和目前的環境審查階段。 RET 規定了一個過程和一組問題，以指導項目的發展、實施和評估，從而促進種族平等。 RET 過程在項目開發早期已開始，為數據分析、技術評估以及社區參與的重點和程度提供資訊。環境審查的階段中，RET 在本項目的環境公義評估的基礎上，記錄了項目的潛在影響和效益，以及社區的意見。然而，鑑於 RET 過程是由一個不同於《環境影響報告》環境公義要求的框架所指導，種族公平工具包的過程和結果的報告結構並不相同，並且會以項目的 RET 的結果為導向。關於過程、要求、結果和結論的 RET 報告草案現已公佈。

Interbay/Ballard 備選方案

Map of Ballard, Interbay and Smith Cove stations in northwest Seattle showing pink line for preferred alternatives, brown lines for preferred alternatives with third party funding, and blue lines for other Draft EIS alternatives. Lines indicate elevated, at-grade and tunnel alternatives. See text description below for additional details. Click to enlarge — 點擊放大

Ballard和Interbay區段14th Avenue高架備選方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
14th Avenue高架備選方案將由平行於BNSF鐵路公司軌道的高架導軌上方越過West Dravus Street，然後向東北方向彎曲，到達Interbay車站。車站將剛好位於West Dravus Street以北的鐵軌和17th Avenue West之間。該備選方案將繼續從Interbay車站向東北方向通過Emerson Street交叉道，然後向北彎曲，在Ballard橋（15th Avenue大橋）東側的固定跨度橋樑上跨越Salmon Bay。備選方案路線將繼續通過14th Avenue Northwest的右側向北行駛，然後轉換到Northwest Market Street以南的道路東側邊緣。Ballard車站將位於14th Avenue Northwest的東側，橫跨Northwest Market Street 。高架軌道末端將沿14th Avenue Northwest的東側延伸至車站以北，然後彎向西側至車行道中央上方處終止。

Ballard和Interbay區段14th Avenue隧道備選方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
14th Avenue隧道備選方案將穿越West Dravus Street的下方，進入平行於BNSF鐵路公司軌道的保留通道，然後向東北方向彎曲，到達Interbay車站。車站將位於West Dravus Street以北，17th Avenue West以及Thorndyke Avenue West之間的保留通道處。備選方案將從Interbay車站的保留通道處繼續延伸到15th Avenue West和Thorndyke Avenue West之間的隧道入口。該隧道將在Emerson Street交叉道下方往東北方向延伸，通過Salmon Bay下方（Ballard大橋以東），然後在14th Avenue Northwest下方向北彎曲，到達Northwest Market Street。該車站將位於14th Avenue Northwest和Northwest Market Street的下方。軌道末端將延伸到車站北面的14th Avenue Northwest下方。

Ballard和Interbay區段15th Avenue隧道車站選項的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
15th Avenue隧道的車站方案的Interbay站和隧道路線將與14th Avenue隧道備選方案相同，直到隧道入口以北，於該處，此方案將在Salmon Bay下方向北延伸，並於15th Avenue Northwest東側的隧道中繼續延伸，直通Ballard站。該車站將位於15th Avenue Northwest的東方和Northwest Market Street的南方。軌道末端將延伸到車站北側15th Avenue Northwest的東側地下。

Ballard和Interbay區段14th Avenue高架備選路線方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
14th Avenue高架備選路線方案是連接South Interbay區段的Prospect Street車站/15th Avenue備選路線與過渡到Salmon Bay的14th Avenue高架備選方案的設計方案。該路線將從15th Avenue West的Interbay車站北側開始。該路線將延伸到15th Avenue West和West Emerson Street交叉口東北方向的高架導軌上，並將連接到14th Avenue的路線橫跨Salmon Bay。橫跨Salmon Bay的橋樑和朝向北面的高架導軌將與14th Avenue高架備選方案相同。

Ballard和Interbay區段15th Avenue高架備選方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
15th Avenue高架備選方案將於15th Avenue West的中間穿過West Dravus Street。Interbay車站將架高至15th Avenue West上方，橫跨West Dravus Street。該備選方案將繼續從15th Avenue West西側的Interbay車站沿高架導軌往上爬升，並爬升至穿越過Emerson Street交叉道。從該交叉道出發，此備選方案路線將跨越Ballard大橋以西的漁人碼頭 (Fishermen’s Terminal) 之東側，並通過一座可移動的橋樑跨越Salmon Bay。備選方案路線將沿該橋繼續向北延伸，通過15th Avenue Northwest西側的高架導軌，並在Northwest 52nd Street附近過渡到15th Avenue Northwest的東端。Ballard車站將高架於Northwest Market Street以南的15th Avenue Northwest東側邊緣之上。高架軌道末端將沿15th Avenue Northwest東端的右側向車站以北延伸。

Compare Interbay/Ballard Alternatives

This slide is a comparison table with a summary of project considerations for alternatives in Interbay/Ballard. It focuses on the performance level of each alternative for each of the project considerations and comprises a 5-column, 6-row table. The column headers read: Elevated 14th Avenue, Tunnel 14th Avenue, Tunnel 15th Avenue Option, Elevated 15th Avenue, Elevated 14th Avenue Option (from Prospect/15th). The row headers read: Project cost (2019 in billions), residential displacements, historic property effects, employee displacements, in-water effects, and other considerations. Text under the table reads: The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. For project cost, the Elevated 15th Avenue, Tunnel 14th Avenue, and Elevated 15th Avenue alternatives perform highest by being the lowest in cost. For residential displacement, The Tunnel 14th Avenue and Elevated 15th Avenue best mitigate residential displacement, performing the highest. The Tunnel 14th Avenue and Tunnel 15th Avenue Option affect the least number of historic properties, performing highest. The Tunnel 14th Avenue, Tunnel 15th Avenue Option, and Elevated 14th Avenue Option (from Prospect /15th) perform highest at the amount of employees displaced. The Tunnel 14th Avenue and Tunnel 15th Avenue alternatives produce no in-water effects. The Tunnel 14th Avenue alternative performed highest overall. The information provided within each cell reflect the information provided in each alternative’s individual table and callout box slide. Please refer to the individual alternatives slides or to the DEIS for further detail. — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Elevated 14th Avenue and includes a single column table with six rows on the left and the Elevated 14th Avenue route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.5 billion. Row 2: 104 residential unit displacements. Row 3: 5 historic properties affected. Row 4: 600 employee displacements. Row 5: In-water effects (permanent) – 0.7 acres. Row 6: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with three callout boxes. One callout box has a house icon, which indicates residential displacement. It is pointing to an area in Interbay near the proposed route along 11th Avenue, the text reads “multi-family buildings.” There are three callout boxes pointing to the river, with a water drop icon, which indicates in-water effects. The texts read: “Habitat”. “Navigation”. “Tribal Fishing Treaty Rights”. There are two callout boxes with magnifying glass icons, which indicates other considerations. One is pointing to Ballard waterline adjacent to the river. The text reads: ”boat ramp and stormwater outfall relocation.” The other callout box is pointing to both sides of the river. The text reads: “Maritime business displacements.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Tunnel 14th Avenue and includes a single column table with six rows on the left and the Tunnel 14th Avenue route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.5 billion. Row 2: 14 residential unit displacements. Row 3: 2 Historic property effects – 2 properties. Row 4: 380 Employee displacements. Row 5: No permanent in-water effects. Row 6: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Tunnel 15th Avenue Station Option and includes a single column table with six rows on the left and the Elevated 14th Avenue route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.7 billion. Row 2: Twenty-one residential unit displacements. Row 3: One historic property is affected. Row 4: 370 employee displacements. Row 5: No permanent in-water effects. Construction Effects See Map. Row 6: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with one callout box. The callout box has a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. It is pointing to the proposed station in Ballard and the text reads: “Construction closures on 15th.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Elevated 14th Avenue Option (from Prospect/15th) and includes a single column table with six rows on the left and the alternative route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.6 billion. Row 2: 136 residential unit displacements. Row 3: Six historic properties effected. Row 4: 390 employee displacements. Row 5: In-water effects (permanent) – 0.7 acres. Row 6: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with three callout boxes. One callout box has a house icon, which indicates residential displacement. It is pointing to an area in Interbay near the proposed route along 11th Avenue, the text reads “multi-family buildings.” There are three callout boxes pointing to the river, with a water drop icon, which indicates in-water effects. The texts read: “Habitat”. “Navigation”. “Tribal Fishing Treaty Rights”. There are two callout boxes with magnifying glass icons, which indicates other considerations. One is pointing to Ballard waterline adjacent to the river. The text reads: ”boat ramp and stormwater outfall relocation.” The other callout box is pointing to both sides of the river. The text reads: “Maritime business displacements.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Elevated 15th Avenue and includes a single column table with six rows on the left and the alternative route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.5 billion. Row 2: 11 residential unit displacements. Row 3: Seven historic properties effected. Row 4: 600 employee displacements. Row 5: In-water effects (permanent) – 0.8 acres. Row 6: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with seven callout boxes. One callout box has a historic building icon, which indicates historic property effects. It is pointing to the Fisherman’s Terminal and the text reads “Historic District.” Another callout box has a people icon, indicating employee displacement. It is pointing to an area just east of the proposed station in Ballard and the text reads ”Commercial Complex 410”. There are three callout boxes pointing to the river, with a water drop icon, which indicates in-water effects. The texts read: “Habitat”. “Navigation”. “Tribal Fishing Treaty Rights”. There are two callout boxes with magnifying glass icons, which indicates other project considerations. One is pointing to the Ballard waterline just north of West Seattle Bridge. The text reads: ”Delays to bridge openings”. The other callout box is pointing to both sides of the river. The text reads: “Maritime business displacements.” — 點擊放大

South Interbay 備選方案

South Interbay (Smith Cove) 區段Galer Street車站/Central Interbay備選方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
Galer Street車站/Central Interbay備選方案的隧道將在市區區段的Republican Street下方由2nd Avenue West到5th Avenue West東側的隧道入口繼續延伸。自隧道入口處，備選方案路線將變為高架，並穿過Elliott Avenue West的西側，繼續向西北方向延伸。導軌將穿過Elliott Avenue West的東側，靠近West Mercer Place，並在Elliott Avenue West東側和Kinnear Park之間繼續向西北延伸。在Kinnear Park以北，路線將過渡到Elliott Avenue West的西側，進入Smith Cove車站。Smith Cove車站將高架於West Galer Street大橋之上。從Smith Cove車站出發，高架軌道將穿過Magnolia大橋，沿著BNSF鐵路軌道的東側繼續向北延伸至West Armory Way。從West Armory Way開始，該路線將沿Interbay Golf Center和Interbay Athletic Complex的西端繼續向北延伸。高架導軌將繼續跨越West Dravus Street，並連接到Interbay/Ballard區段的14th Avenue高架備選方案路線。在Interbay/Ballard區段，該備選方案將與隧道備選方案（14th Avenue隧道備選方案和15th Avenue隧道的車站方案）連接，然後沿著Interbay Athletic Complex從高架過渡到地面，繼續在West Dravus Street下方行駛。

South Interbay (Smith Cove) 區段Prospect Street車站/15th Avenue備選方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
Prospect Street車站/15th Avenue備選方案的隧道將在市區區段的Republican Street下方由2nd Avenue West到5th Avenue West東側的隧道入口繼續延伸。自隧道入口處，備選方案路線將變為高架，並穿過Elliott Avenue West的西側，繼續向西北方向延伸。導軌將穿過Elliott Avenue West的東側，靠近West Mercer Place，並在Elliott Avenue West東側和Kinnear Park之間繼續向西北延伸。它將進入位於Elliott Avenue West東側的Kinnear Park北側的Smith Cove高架站。該站將位於West Prospect Street以北。從Smith Cove站開始，高架導軌將繼續沿Elliott Avenue West的東側向西北方向延伸，過渡到沿Southwest Queen Anne Greenbelt邊緣的保留通道，然後轉向北，過渡到West Newton Street附近的15th Avenue West中央處。它將繼續通過15th Avenue West中間的高架導軌行駛至West Barrett Street。此備選方案路線僅與橋樑替代方案路線（Interbay/Ballard區段的14th Avenue高架替代路線方案和15th Avenue高架備選方案）連接。

South Interbay (Smith Cove) 區段Prospect Street車站/Central Interbay備選方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
Prospect Street車站/Central Interbay備選方案的隧道將通過市區的2nd Avenue West區段到位於Kinnear Park的西北邊緣、West Prospect Street以南的Elliott Avenue West東側的隧道入口，繼續在West Mercer Street下方延伸。該備選方案將自位於West Prospect Street以北的Smith Cove站保留通道處的隧道入口繼續向北延伸。車站將位於保留通道處，而備選方案將沿著Southwest Queen Anne Greenbelt邊緣的保留通道處繼續向北延伸。該備選方案將在West Howe Street附近過渡到高架導軌，並在West Armory Way穿過15th Avenue West，沿West Armory Way北側向西北方向行駛。從West Armory Way開始，該備選方案將沿Interbay Golf Center和Interbay Athletic Complex的西端繼續向北延伸，然後繼續穿過West Dravus Street，與14th Avenue高架備選方案的路線連接。在Interbay/Ballard區段，該備選方案將與隧道備選方案（14th Avenue隧道備選方案和15th Avenue隧道的車站方案）連接，然後沿著Interbay Athletic Complex從高架過渡到地面，然後繼續在West Dravus Street下方行駛。

Compare South Interbay Alternatives

This slide is a comparison table with a summary of project considerations for alternatives in South Interbay. It focuses on the performance level of each alternative for each of the project considerations and comprises a 3-column, 7-row table. The column headers read: Galer Street Station/Central Interbay, Prospect Street Station/15th Avenue, and Prospect Street Station/Central Interbay. The row headers read: Project cost (2019 in billions), residential displacements, historic property effects, park effects (permanent), biodiversity effects (permanent), roadway effects (permanent), and other considerations. Text under the table reads: The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. For project cost, the Galer Street Station/Central Interbay alternative performs highest by being the lowest in cost. For residential displacement, the Prospect Street Station/Central Interbay would displace the fewest residential units, performing the highest. It also performs highest in the number of historic properties it would affect. Prospect Street Station/15th Avenue performs highest in permanent park effects, by having the least amount of parkland affected among the alternatives. Galer Street Station/Central Interbay impacts the least amount of biodiversity, performing highest. Prospect Street Station/Central Interbay would have the least effect on the roadway of all alternatives, performing highest. The information provided within each cell reflect the information provided in each alternative’s individual table and callout box slide. Please refer to the individual alternatives slides or to the DEIS for further detail. — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Galer Street Station/Central Interbay and includes a single column table with seven rows on the left and the alternative route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.3 billion. Row 2: 140 residential unit displacements. Row 3: Seven historic properties affected. Row 4: 3.1 acres of parkland permanently affected. Row 5: Less than 0.1 acre of biodiversity permanently affected. Row 6: 0.4 Miles of Roadway (Guideway) affected. Row 7: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with five callout boxes. One callout box has a house icon, which indicates residential displacement. It is pointing at an area along 4th Avenue near the proposed route and the text reads “Multi-family buildings.” One callout box has a tree icon, which indicates permanent park effects. It is pointing at the Interbay Golf Center and the text reads “Interbay recreation facilities.” Three callout boxes have a car icon, which indicates roadway effects. Each of the callout boxes point to the proposed route with text that reads: “construction closures on Eliot,” “Complex utility relocations,” and “Left turn restrictions.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Prospect Street Station/15th Ave and includes a single column table with seven rows on the left and the alternative route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.4 to 1.5 billion. Row 2: 123 residential unit displacements. Row 3: Eight historic properties affected. Row 4: 1.3 acres of parkland permanently affected. Row 5: 4.6 acres of biodiversity permanently affected. Row 6: 1.0 Miles of Roadway (Guideway) affected. Row 7: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with seven callout boxes. One callout box has a bird icon, which indicates permanent biodiversity effects. It is pointing at an area along the proposed route and the text reads “SW Queen Anne Greenbelt.” One callout box has a tree icon, which indicates permanent park effects. It is pointing at Kinnear Park and the text reads “Kinnear Park.” One callout box has a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. It is pointing at the proposed station location and the text reads “Steep slopes.” Three callout boxes have a car icon, which indicates roadway effects. Each of the callout boxes point to the proposed route with text that reads: “construction closures on Eliot,” “Complex utility relocations,” and “Left turn restrictions.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Prospect Street Station/Central Interbay and includes a single column table with seven rows on the left and the alternative route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.5 to 1.6 billion. Row 2: 5 residential unit displacements. Row 3: Two historic properties affected. Row 4: 4.5 acres of parkland permanently affected. Row 5: 5.7 acres of biodiversity permanently affected. Row 6: 0.1 Miles of Roadway (Guideway) affected. Row 7: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with four callout boxes. One callout box has a bird icon, which indicates permanent biodiversity effects. It is pointing at an area along the proposed route and the text reads “SW Queen Anne Greenbelt.” Two callout boxes have a tree icon, which indicates permanent park effects. The first callout box is pointing at Kinnear Park and the text reads “Kinnear Park.” The second box is pointing at the Interbay Golf Center and the text reads “Interbay recreation facilities.” One callout box has a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. It is pointing at the proposed station location and the text reads “Steep slopes.” — 點擊放大

Downtown 備選方案

位於Seattle的Seattle Center站、South Lake Union站、Denny站、Westlake站和Midtown站的地圖，其中粉紅色線表示首選方案，藍色線表示其他《環境影響報告草案》(EIS草案) 備選方案。更多詳細資訊請參閱以下文字說明。 — 點擊放大

點擊放大

5th Avenue/Harrison Street備選方案將是一條隧道，大體上在5th Avenue和Westlake Avenue下由南向北延伸，然後在Harrison Street和Republican Street下方轉向西延伸。各車站的位置如下：

Midtown站：該車站將位於5th Avenue的下方，在Columbia Street和Madison Street之間。
Westlake站：該車站將位於5th Avenue的下方，在Pike Street和Pine Street之間。
Denny站：該車站將位於Westlake Avenue的下方，在Denny Way和Lenora Street之間。
South Lake Union站：該車站將位於Harrison Street下方，在Dexter Avenue North和Aurora Avenue North的西端之間。
Seattle Center站：該車站將位於Republican Street下方，1st Avenue North的東側。

點擊放大

6th Avenue/Mercer Street備選方案將是一條隧道，大體上在6th Avenue和Terry Avenue下由南向北延伸，然後在Mercer Street下方轉向西延伸。各車站的位置如下：

Midtown站：該車站將位於6th Avenue的下方，在Madison Street和Seneca Street之間。
Westlake站：該車站將位於6th Avenue的下方，在Pine Street和Olive Way之間。
Denny站：該車站將位於Terry Avenue North的下方，在Denny Way和John Street之間。
South Lake Union站：該車站將位於Mercer Street北方，在Aurora Avenue North和Taylor Avenue North之間。
Seattle Center站：該車站將位於Mercer Street下方，Warren Avenue North和Queen Anne Avenue North之間。

Compare Downtown Alternatives

This slide is a comparison table with a summary of project considerations for alternatives in Downtown. It focuses on the performance level of each alternative for each of the project considerations and comprises a 2-column, 7-row table. The column headers read: 5th/Harrison and 6th/Mercer. The row headers read: Project cost (2019 in billions), residential displacements, business displacements, historic property effects, park effects (permanent), and traffic effects (full closures). Text to the right of the table reads: The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. For lowest project cost, lowest residential displacement, fewest historic properties effected, and fewest park effects considerations, the 5th/Harrison alternative performed highest. The 6th/Mercer alternative affected the fewest number of roadway closures, performing highest. The information provided within each cell largely reflect the information provided in each alternative’s individual table and callout box slide except for some additional connection considerations. The 5th/Harrison alternative connects to all CID alternatives and connects to both Galer Street Stations in South Interbay. The 6th/Mercer alternative connects only to CID shallow alternatives and only to the Prospect Street Station in South Interbay. Please refer to the individual alternatives slides or to the DEIS for further detail. — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled 5th/Harrison and includes a single column table with seven rows on the left and the alternative route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $4.7 to 4.9 billion. Row 2: Twenty-six residential unit displacements. Row 3: 44 to 46 business displacements. Row 4. Three historic properties affected. Row 5: 0.4 acres of parkland permanently affected. Row 6: Traffic effects (full closures) 5 to 8 roadways would be fully closed. Row 7: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with four callout boxes. One callout box has a tree icon, which indicates permanent parkland effects. It is pointing at the proposed Seattle Center station and the text reads “Seattle Center.” Three callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. One box is pointing at the Denny neighborhood and the text reads “Disruption to streetcar operation.” Another box is pointing to an area between the proposed Denny and South Lake Union station and the text reads “Groundborne noise/vibration effects – 2 uses.” The final box is pointing just south of the proposed Seattle Center and the text reads “Groundborne noise/vibration effects – 5 uses.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled 6th/Mercer and includes a single column table with seven rows on the left and the alternative route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $4.9 to 5.0 billion. Row 2: 167 residential unit displacements. Row 3: 47 business displacements Row 4: Nine historic properties affected. Row 5: 0.6 acres of parkland permanently affected. Row 6: Traffic effects (full closures) 4 roadways would be fully closed. Row 7: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with four callout boxes. One callout box has a house icon, which indicates residential displacement. It is pointing at the proposed Midtown station and the text reads “126 Temporary residential displacements.” One callout box has a tree icon, which indicates permanent park effects. It is pointing at the proposed Midtown station and the text reads “Naramore Fountain Park, Freeway Park.” Three callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. One box is pointing at the Denny neighborhood and the text reads “Disruption to streetcar operation.” Another box is pointing to an area between the proposed Denny and South Lake Union station and the text reads “Groundborne noise/vibration effects – 2 uses.” The final box is pointing just south of the proposed Seattle Center and the text reads “Groundborne noise/vibration effects – 5 uses.” — 點擊放大

Chinatown-International District 備選方案

Seattle的Chinatown-International District車站地圖，其他《環境影響報告草案》(EIS草案) 備選方案以藍線表示。線條表示隧道備選方案。更多詳細資訊請參閱以下文字說明。 — 點擊放大

Chinatown-International District區段4th Avenue淺層備選方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
4th Avenue淺層備選方案將從現有Link輕軌沿線以東的South Holgate Street附近的地面開始，並向北延伸。該備選方案將在Edgar Martinez Drive South和South Royal Brougham Way之間引入一條隧道。隧道將繼續向西北方向延伸，在South Royal Brougham Way的現有Link輕軌沿線下方延伸，然後在4th Avenue South下方轉向北方延伸。Chinatown-International District的新車站將位於現有的Chinatown-International District車站西側的4th Avenue South下方。4th Avenue South高架橋將拆除並重建，以配合此車站的建設。

Chinatown-International District區段4th Avenue深層車站方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
4th Avenue深層車站方案將從現有Link輕軌沿線以東的South Holgate Street附近的地面開始，並向北延伸。隧道入口將位於South Massachusetts Street附近，隧道路線將開始過渡到比4th Avenue淺層備選方案更南端的4th Avenue South。從Seattle Boulevard South到James Street，路線和車站位置將與4th Avenue淺層備選方案相似，但會通往更深的位置。

Chinatown-International District區段5th Avenue淺層備選方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
5th Avenue淺層備選方案將從現有Link輕軌沿線以東的South Holgate Street附近的地面開始，並向北延伸。該備選方案將在South Massachusetts Street附近引入一條隧道，並在6th Avenue South下方繼續向北延伸。隧道將過渡到Seattle Boulevard South以北的5th Avenue South下方。Chinatown-International District的車站將位於現有的Chinatown-International District車站東側的5th Avenue South下方。另一個備選方案的路線將過渡到Seattle Boulevard South更北方的5th Avenue，車站入口位置相似。

第五大道淺層對角式站將與第五大道淺層站一樣，除了該軌道將過渡至5th Avenue South以北的Seattle Boulevard South，以及類近的車站出入口位置。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
第五大道淺層對角式站將與第五大道淺層站一樣，除了該軌道將過渡至5th Avenue South以北的Seattle Boulevard South，以及類近的車站出入口位置。

Chinatown-International District區段5th Avenue深層車站方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
5th Avenue深層車站方案大體上會與5th Avenue淺層備選方案的路線相同，但隧道和車站會位於更深的位置。

Compare Chinatown-International District Alternatives

This slide is a comparison table with a summary of project considerations for alternatives in the Chinatown-International District. It focuses on the performance level of each alternative for each of the project considerations and comprises a 6-column, 6-row table. The column headers read: 4th Shallow, 4th Deep, 5th Shallow, 5th Shallow Diagonal Station Configuration, and 5th Deep. The row headers read: Project cost (2019 in billions), residential displacements, business displacements, platform access, construction effects, and other considerations. Text under the table reads: The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. For project cost, the 5th Shallow and 5th Shallow Diagonal Station Configuration alternative perform highest by being the lowest in cost. For residential displacement, all but the 4th Shallow alternative would cause no residential displacement, performing the highest. The 4th Shallow and 4th Deep alternatives performed highest in mitigating business displacement. The 4th Shallow, 5th Shallow, and 5th Shallow Diagonal Station Configuration alternatives all performed highly in platform access. The 5th Shallow Diagonal Station Configuration and 5th Deep alternatives performed highest in construction effects. The information provided within each cell largely reflect the information provided in each alternative’s individual table and callout box slide except for some additional connection considerations for each alternative. The additional considerations for the 4th Shallow alternative include: connects to all downtown alternatives, connects all SODO alternatives, affects Ryerson bus base. The additional considerations for the 4th Deep alternative include: Connects only to downtown 5th Avenue/Harrison Street, connects only to the SODO At-Grade South Station option, displaces Ryerson bus base. The additional considerations for the 5th Shallow alternative include: connects to all downtown alternatives and connects to all SODO alternatives. The additional considerations for the 5th Shallow Diagonal Station Configuration include: Connects to all DT alternatives and connects to all SODO alternatives. The additional considerations four the 5th Deep alternative include: Connects only to Downtown 5th Ave/Harrison St. Connects to SODO At-Grade, SODO At-Grade Staggered Station Configuration and SODO At-Grade South Station Option. Please refer to the individual alternatives slides or to the DEIS for further detail. — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled 4th Shallow and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the alternative route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.8 billion (plus 100 million in additional cost for the preferred alternative in the Downtown Segment as compared to the 5th Shallow connection). Row 2: 120 residential unit displacements. Row 3: 5 to 8 business displacements. Row 4: Construction effects. See map. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: The 4th Avenue Shallow alternative would necessitate reconstruction of the existing Stadium Station. Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with eight callout boxes. Six callout boxes have a traffic cone icon, which indicates traffic effects. The first box is pointing to the existing light rail line south of Stadium Station and the text reads “Link light rail closure ** 6 to 7 weeks.” The second callout box is pointing to the existing Stadium station and the text reads “Closes Stadium Station (up to 2 years). Two boxes are pointing at the proposed Chinatown Station and the texts read: “Detours 15,000 vehicles per day (6 years)” and “Station construction duration (9-11 years).” The next box is just south of the proposed Chinatown Station Seattle Center station and the text reads “Relocates major utilities.” The final construction effects callout box is pointing at the proposed route just north of the proposed Chinatown Station and the textbox reads “Disrupts streetcar operations (2 years).” One callout box has a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. It is pointing at the existing Stadium Station and the text reads “Affects Ryerson Bus Base.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled 4th Deep Station Option and includes a single column table with six rows on the left and the alternative route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.7 billion plus 200 million to account for additional cost for the preferred alternative in the Downtown segment as compared to the 5th Avenue Shallow connection. Row 2: No residential unit displacements. Row 3: Five business displacements. Row 4: Elevator Only Platform Access. Row 5: Construction Effects See Map. Row 6: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with six callout boxes. One callout box has a magnifying glass icon, which indicates that it is an additional project consideration. The callout box states “Displaces Ryerson Bus Base” and is pointing to the King County Metro Ryerson Base. The next four callout boxes have traffic cone icons, which indicate that they are construction effects. Two callout boxes point at the proposed light rail station along 4th Avenue and the texts read: “Station construction (duration 8 to 10 years)” and “Detours 30,000 vehicles per day (6.5 years).” The next callout box is pointing to a section of the proposed light rail route just north of the of the proposed Chinatown station and the text reads “Disrupts streetcar operations (2 years). The last construction effects callout box is pointing to a section of the proposed route just south of the proposed station location and the text reads “Relocates Major Utilities”. There is a final callout box that points to the cross-section cutaway of the station with a streetcar icon, which indicates platform access. The text reads “Elevator Only” and is pointing to the proposed Chinatown/International District Station platform. — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled 5th Shallow and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the 5th Shallow Alternative route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.2 to 1.3 billion. Row 2: No residential units displacements. Row 3: 19 business displacements. Row 4: Construction Effects See Map. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with five callout boxes with traffic cone icons, which indicate that they are construction effects. Three of the callout boxes point to the proposed Chinatown/International District Station along 5th Avenue and the texts read: “Construction duration (8 to 9 years)”; “Detours 5,000 vehicles per day (9 months)”; and “Relocates major utilities and utility corridor”. Another callout box is pointing to a section of the proposed light rail route north of the proposed section and the text reads “Disrupts streetcar operations (6 months)” The final callout box is pointing to an area east of the proposed route and north of I-90 and states “Re-routes trolley bus (to 7th or 8th Ave S).” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled 5th Shallow Diagonal Station Configuration and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the 5th Shallow Diagonal Station Configuration route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.2 to 1.3 billion. Row 2: No residential unit displacements. Row 3: 19 business displacements. Row 4: Construction Effects See Map. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail.
The map to the right is overlayed with three callout boxes with traffic cone icons, which indicate that they are construction effects. Two of the callout boxes point to the proposed Chinatown/International District Station along 5th Avenue. The text of the callout boxes read: “Station construction duration (5 to 6 years)” and “Temporary closure 8 businesses (<1 year).” The third callout box points to an area west of the proposed light rail station and the text reads: “Avoids major utility relocations.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled 5th Deep Station Option and includes a single column table with six rows on the left
and the 5th Deep Station Option route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has
the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.3 billion plus 200 million to account
for additional cost for the preferred alternative in the Downtown segment as compared to the
5th Avenue Shallow connection. Row 2: No residential unit displacements. Row
3: Eighteen business displacements. Row 4: Elevator Only Platform Access. Row 5: Construction Effects See
Map. Row 6: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not
to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please
refer to DEIS for further detail.
The map to the right is overlayed with two callout boxes with orange traffic cone
icons, which indicate that they are construction effects. They both point to
the proposed Chinatown/International District Station along 5th Avenue. The text on the callout boxes
read: “Station construction (duration 6.5 to 7.5 years)” and “Avoids
major utility relocations.”
There is a third callout box that points to the cross-section cutaway of the station with a streetcar icon,
which indicates platform access. The text reads “Elevator Only” and is pointing to
the Chinatown/International District Station platform. — 點擊放大

SODO 備選方案

SODO Seattle的地圖，其中粉紅色線表示首選方案，藍色線表示其他《環境影響報告草案》(EIS草案) 備選方案。線條表示高架和地面備選方案。更多詳細資訊請參閱以下文字說明。 — 點擊放

SODO地段的地形替代圖和剖面圖顯示了擬定的路線和高架剖面圖。詳情請參閱上面的文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
地面備選方案將在SODO Busway的現有Link輕軌線以西的地面行駛，並與之平行。它將從新的South Holgate Street立交橋下穿過，進而與地面的車輛交通分隔開來。SODO站將是地面站，緊靠現有的SODO站以西，South Lander Street以北。該備選方案將繼續在South Lander Street下方的地面向南延伸，該街道將重建為輕軌的立交橋，進而與地面的車輛交通分隔開來。該輕軌將沿South Lander Street以南的SODO Busway過渡到高架導軌。

交錯車站配置將與地面備選方案(首選方案)一樣，除了位於西邊的月台將稍為往北移，車站出入口位置一樣。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
交錯車站配置將與地面備選方案(首選方案)一樣，除了位於西邊的月台將稍為往北移，車站出入口位置一樣。

在Delridge區段的Dakota Street車站備選方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
除了SODO車站的位置外，地面南車站方案與首選方案基本相同。新的地面車站將緊鄰現有的SODO車站以西和以南約200英尺處，就位於South Lander Street以北。現有的SODO站也將移至其現有位置以南200英尺處，與新的SODO站相鄰。

SODO地段的混合剖面替代圖和剖面顯示了擬定的路線和高程剖面。詳情請參閱上面的文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
混合型備選方案將在SODO Busway的現有SODO站以北、現有Link輕軌線以西的地面行駛，並與Link輕軌線平行。South Holgate Street將建成一個新的道路上跨交叉口，進而與地面的車輛交通分隔開來。在South Walker Street，路線將過渡到高架導軌，並將繼續向南穿過South Lander Street。新的SODO站將在South Lander Street以北架高。該備選方案將於South Lander Street架高，在現有的輕軌線上設置一個如大門一般的地面交叉口，與目前的情況類似。現有的SODO站將按照南車站地面方案進行搬遷，並與新的高架車站於地面相鄰。

Compare SODO Alternatives

點擊放大

The slide is labeled At-Grade and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and an At-Grade SODO station location map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $0.6 to 0.7 billion. Row 2: 20 to 32 business displacements. Row 3: Transportation effects. See map. Row 4: Construction Effects. See Map. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with three callout boxes. One callout box has a traffic cone icon, which indicates it is a construction effect. It is pointing to a new South Lander Street overpass and the text reads: “South Lander Street closure (2 years)”. One callout box has a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations.” It is pointing at the New South Lander Street overpass as well as the new South Holgate Street overpass and the text reads: “Two new grade separated crossings.” The final callout box has a bus icon, which indicates transportation effects. It is pointing to the SODO Busway and the text reads: “SODO Busway (permanent closure).” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled At-Grade Staggered Station Configuration and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and an At-Grade SODO station location map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $0.5-0.6 billion. Row 2: 19 to 31 business displacements. Row 3: Transportation effects. See map. Row 4: Construction Effects. See Map. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with four callout boxes. One callout box has a traffic cone icon, which indicates it is a construction effect. It is pointing to the new South Lander Street overpass and the text reads: “S. Lander Street closure (2 years).” Two callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. The first callout box is pointing to the new South Lander Street overpass and the text reads: “Avoids USPS acquisition.” The second callout box pointing at the new South Lander Street overpass as well as the new South Holgate Street overpass and the text reads: “Two new grade separated crossings.” The final callout box has a bus icon, which indicates transportation effects. It is pointing to the SODO Busway and the text reads: “SODO Busway (permanent closure).” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled At-Grade South Station Option and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and an At-Grade SODO South Station location map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $0.6 to 0.7 billion. Row 2: 17 to 29 business displacements. Row 3: Transportation effects. See map. Row 4: Construction effects. See Map. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the cross-section cutaway reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. The map to the right is overlayed with three callout boxes. One callout box has a traffic cone icon, which indicates it is a construction effect. It is pointing to a new South Lander Street overpass and the text reads: “S. Lander Street closure (3 years).” One callout box has a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. It is pointing at the New South Lander Street overpass as well as the new South Holgate Street overpass and the text reads: “Two new grade separated crossings.” The final callout box has a bus icon, which indicates transportation effects. It is pointing to the SODO Busway and the text reads: “SODO Busway (permanent closure).” — 點擊放大

點擊放大

Duwamish 備選方案

Seattle西南部的Delridge、Avalon和Alaska Junction車站地圖，其中粉紅色線代表首選方案、棕色線代表由第三方出資的首選方案，而藍色線代表其他《環境影響報告草案》(EIS草案) 備選方案。線條表示高架、地面和隧道的替代方案。更多詳細資訊請參閱以下文字說明。 — 點擊放大

跨越Duwamish Waterway區段的南交叉口備選方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
南跨河道備選方案將從South Forest Street沿現有輕軌西側的高架導軌繼續向南，經過維護基地 (Operations and Maintenance Facility Central)，然後向西南方向穿過Spokane Street大橋和West Seattle大橋的南側。該備選方案路線將繼續向西，向West Seattle大橋的南面延伸。備選方案路線將通過一座固定的輕軌專用橋跨越East Duwamish Waterway、Harbor Island和West Duwamish Waterway。在Duwamish Waterway跨河道以西，該備選方案將以高架導軌及保留通道和填充相結合的方式穿越Pigeon Point的北緣，然後沿著Delridge Way Southwest的高架導軌轉向西南方向。

跨越Duwamish Waterway區段的南交叉口南端路線方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
南跨河道南端交彙處路線方案與南跨河道首選方案相同，但它將在Harbor Island南端跨越東、西Duwamish Waterway。

跨越Duwamish Waterway區段的北交叉口備選方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大
北跨河道備選方案將從South Forest Street沿現有輕軌線西方的高架導軌繼續向南，然後在現有West Seattle大橋北方新建一座固定的輕軌專用大橋向西行駛。在穿過West Duwamish Waterway後，該備選方案將穿過West Seattle大橋，在Delridge WaySouthwest向南行駛。

Compare Duwamish Alternatives

This slide is a comparison table with a summary of project considerations for alternatives in Duwamish. It focuses on the performance level of each alternative for each of the project considerations and comprises a 3-column, 6-row table. The column headers read: South Crossing Alternative, South Edge Crossing Alignment Option, and North Crossing Alternative. The row headers read: Project cost (2019 in billions), residential displacements, business displacements, maritime business displacements, park effects (permanent), and other considerations. Text under the table reads: The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. For project cost, the South Crossing Alternative performed highest by being the lowest in cost. The North Crossing Alternative has no project residential displacement impact, performing highest. South Edge Grossing Alignment Option performed higher than the South Crossing or North Crossing alternatives by having the lowest numbers of businesses projected to be displaced. However, the South Crossing Alternative had the fewest number of maritime business displacements. The North Crossing Alternative has no projected permanent park effects, performing highest. The information provided within each cell reflects the information provided in each alternative’s individual table and callout box slide. Please refer to the individual alternatives slides or to the DEIS for further detail. — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled South Crossing Alternative and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the South Crossing Alternative route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.2 billion. Row 2: 26 residential displacements. Row 3: 36 business displacements. Row 4: 1.5 acres of parkland permanently affected. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the table reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. Connection to preferred alternative in Delridge is shown for illustration purposes. The map to the right is overlayed with five callout boxes. Two callout boxes have a tree icon, indicating park effects. The first callout box is pointing to the West Duwamish greenbelt south of the proposed route and the text reads: “West Duwamish Greenbelt. 1.2 acres.” The second callout box is pointing to the T-102 Park and the text reads: “T-102 Park. 0.3 acres.” Two callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. One callout box is pointing to the southern portion of Hunter Island, south of the proposed route and the text reads: “BNSF Bridge constructability.” The other callout box is pointing to the intersection of Delridge Way SW and 21st Ave and the text reads “Pigeon Point constructability.” The final callout box has an anchor icon, which indicates maritime-dependent businesses. It is pointing to a port alongside the West Seattle Bridge and the text reads: “Maritime-dependent businesses. 3.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled South Edge Crossing Alignment Option and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the South Edge Crossing Alignment Option route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.3 billion. Row 2: 26 residential displacements. Row 3: 29 business displacements. Row 4: 1.9 acres of parkland permanently affected. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the table reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. Connection to preferred alternative in Delridge is shown for illustration purposes. The map to the right is overlayed with five callout boxes. Two callout boxes have a tree icon, indicating park effects. The first callout box is pointing to the West Duwamish greenbelt south of the proposed route and the text reads: “West Duwamish Greenbelt. 1.3 acres.” The second callout box is pointing to the T-102 Park and the text reads: “T-102 Park. 0.6 acres.” Two callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. One callout box is pointing to the BSNF Bridge and the text reads “BNSF Bridge constructability.” The other callout box is pointing to the intersection of Delridge Way SW and 21st Ave and the text reads “Pigeon Point constructability.” The final callout box has an anchor icon, which indicates maritime-dependent businesses. It is pointing to a port on the southern point of Hunter Island and the text reads: “5 Maritime-dependent businesses.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled North Crossing Alternative and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the North Crossing Alternative route map to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.5 billion. Row 2: No residential displacements. Row 3: 38 business displacements. Row 4: No permanent park effects (permanent). Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the table reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. Connection to preferred alternative in Delridge is shown for illustration purposes. The map to the right is overlayed with four callout boxes. Two callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, indicating other considerations. The first callout box is pointing to an area along the East Duwamish waterway north of the West Seattle Bridge and the text reads: “T-25 Restoration Site.” The second callout box is pointing to Hunter Island and West Seattle and the text reads: “Port of Seattle T-5 & T-18.” Another callout box that is pointing to the intersection of 4th Ave South and S Harrison Street and the text reads: “Fire Station 14 effects.” The final callout box has an anchor icon, which indicates maritime-dependent businesses. It is pointing to a port on the southeast side of Hunter Island and the text reads: “10 Maritime-dependent businesses.” — 點擊放大

West Seattle Junction/Delridge 備選方案

Alaska Junction區段Fauntleroy Way高架車站備選方案的地圖和剖面圖，其中顯示了擬議的路線和高架剖面圖。更多詳細資訊請參閱以上文字說明。點擊放大 — 點擊放大

**West Seattle Junction**
Fauntleroy Way高架車站備選方案將沿Southwest Genesee Street南側的31st Avenue Southwest和Fauntleroy Way Southwest之間架高。該路線將沿著Fauntleroy Way Southwest向西南方向延伸，並繼續沿Fauntleroy Way Southwest的西側行駛。該導軌將由Southwest Oregon Street以南橫穿至Fauntleroy Way Southwest的東側。高架軌道末端將從Alaska Junction車站以南開始，在剛好經過Southwest Edmunds Street的Fauntleroy Way Southwest右側終止。各車站的位置如下：

Avalon車站：該車站將沿35th Avenue Southwest東側的Southwest Genesee Street南側架高。

Alaska Junction車站：該車站將架高在Southwest Alaska Street以南的41st Avenue Southwest和42nd Avenue Southwest之間。

**Delridge**
Dakota Street車站備選方案將沿著Delridge Way Southwest的高架導軌向南行駛，到達一個高架車站。導軌將在Delridge Way的西側，它只有在Southwest Andover Street附近會在車道的右側。車站將架高在Delridge Way Southwest和26th Avenue Southwest之間，位於Southwest Dakota Street以南，方向由西南至東北。在車站南面，備選方案路線將向西彎曲，並穿過Southwest Genesee Street的南側、West Seattle Golf Course的北側。導軌將沿著Southwest Genesee Street的南邊繼續向西，並在West Seattle Junction區段連接到高架導軌。

點擊放大

West Seattle Junction

41st Avenue隧道車站備選方案將位於Southwest Genesee Street下方的隧道中，從31st Avenue Southwest向西行駛，然後在37th Avenue Southwest和41st Avenue Southwest之間向西南彎曲。隧道的終點將位於Southwest Hudson Street附近，軌道末端為南北走向，位於41nd Avenue Southwest下方。導軌將完全位於隧道內。各車站的位置如下：

Avalon車站：該車站將位於Fauntleroy Way Southwest下方。
Alaska Junction車站：該車站將位於41st Avenue Southwest和Southwest Alaska Street下方。

Delridge

Dakota Street車站較低高度備選方案將沿用與Dakota Street車站備選方案相同的路線，但高度較低，以連接West Seattle Junction區段的隧道備選方案路線。從車站出發，該備選方案將繼續向南穿過Southwest Genesee Street，並將沿著West Seattle Golf Course的北側邊緣行駛。West Seattle Junction區段的隧道入口將連接到West Seattle Golf Course的西北角、Southwest Genesee Street以南及31st Avenue Southwest以東。位於West Seattle的隧道並沒有納入Sound Transit 3號議案（2016年），這個備選方案只能連接到West Seattle Junction區段的隧道備選方案路線。

點擊放大

West Seattle Junction

Avalon Station: The station would be beneath Fauntleroy Way Southwest.
Alaska Junction Station: The station would be in a tunnel beneath 42nd Avenue Southwest and Southwest Alaska Street.

Delridge

點擊放大

West Seattle Junction

41st Avenue短程隧道車站備選方案將沿著自31st Avenue Southwest到Fauntleroy Way Southwest西側的Southwest Genesee Street南側的高架導軌延伸。它將繼續沿Fauntleroy Way Southwest西側的高架導軌延伸，然後在37th Avenue Southwest附近過渡到地面路線。導軌將在Southwest Oregon Street附近向西轉彎，並在Southwest Oregon Street和38th Avenue Southwest附近過渡成一條帶有入口的隧道。隧道將向南轉彎，終點在Southwest Hudson Street以南，軌道末端呈南北走向，沿著41st Avenue Southwest下方延伸。位於West Seattle的隧道並沒有納入Sound Transit 3號議案（2016年）中。因此，此備選方案需要由第三方提供資金。各車站的位置如下：

Avalon車站：該車站將沿Southwest Genesee Street南側和35th Avenue Southwest東側架高。
Alaska Junction車站：該車站將位於41st Avenue Southwest和Southwest Alaska Street南側下方的隧道中。

Delridge

Dakota Street車站備選方案將沿著Delridge Way Southwest的高架導軌向南行駛，到達一個高架車站。導軌將在Delridge Way的西側，它只有在Southwest Andover Street附近會在車道的右側。車站將架高在Delridge Way Southwest和26th Avenue Southwest之間，位於Southwest Dakota Street以南，方向由西南至東北。在車站南面，備選方案路線將向西彎曲，並穿過Southwest Genesee Street的南側、West Seattle Golf Course的北側。導軌將沿著Southwest Genesee Street的南邊繼續向西，並在West Seattle Junction區段連接到高架導軌。

點擊放大

West Seattle Junction

Fauntleroy Way高架車站備選方案將沿Southwest Genesee Street南側的31st Avenue Southwest和Fauntleroy Way Southwest之間架高。該路線將沿著Fauntleroy Way Southwest向西南方向延伸，並繼續沿Fauntleroy Way Southwest的西側行駛。該導軌將由Southwest Oregon Street以南橫穿至Fauntleroy Way Southwest的東側。高架軌道末端將從Alaska Junction車站以南開始，在剛好經過Southwest Edmunds Street的Fauntleroy Way Southwest右側終止。各車站的位置如下：

Avalon車站：該車站將沿Southwest Genesee Street南側和35th Avenue Southwest東側架高。
Alaska Junction車站：該車站將架高於Fauntleroy Way Southwest的東南方向，橫跨Southwest Alaska Street。

Delridge

Andover Street車站備選方案將位於Delridge Way Southwest西側的高架導軌上，在Southwest Andover Street以北設站，呈東北向西南走向。該路線將沿著Southwest Andover Street的高架導軌向西行駛，然後在Southwest Yancy Street附近沿著Southwest Avalon Way向南行駛。導軌將繼續沿Southwest Avalon Way向南，然後在Southwest Genesee Street北側向西轉。

Compare West Seattle Alternatives

This slide is a comparison table with a summary of project considerations for alternatives in West Seattle and Delridge. It focuses on the performance level of each alternative for each of the project considerations and comprises a 7-column, 5-row table. The column headers read: Elevated Fauntleroy Dakota Street, Elevated 41st/42nd Dakota Street, Tunnel 41st Dakota Street Lower Height, Tunnel 42nd Dakota Street Lower Height, Short Tunnel 41st Dakota Street, Medium Tunnel 41st Andover Street Lower Height, and Elevated Fauntleroy Andover Street. The row headers read: Project cost (2019 in billions), residential displacements, business displacements, park effects (permanent), and other considerations. Text under the table reads: The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. For project cost, the Elevated Fauntleroy Dakota Street, Medium Tunnel 41st Andover Street Lower Height, and Elevated Fauntleroy Andover Street alternatives performed highest by being the lowest in cost. The Medium Tunnel 41st Andover Street Lower Height alternative is projected to have the fewest residential displacements, performing highest. All but the Elevated 41st/42nd Dakota Street and Tunnel 42nd Dakota Street Lower Height alternatives were high performing in business displacements considerations. The Medium Tunnel 41st Andover Street Lower Height and Elevated Fauntleroy Andover Street have no permanent parkland effects, performing highest. The information provided within each cell reflects the information provided in each alternative’s individual table and callout box slide. Please refer to the individual alternatives slides or to the DEIS for further detail. — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Elevated Fauntleroy Way Station - Dakota Street Station and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the route map utilized in the previous slide to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.6 billion. Row 2: 607 residential displacements. Row 3: 32 business displacements. Row 4: 0.6 acres of parkland permanently affected. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the table reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. Connection to preferred alternative in Duwamish is shown for illustration purposes. The map to the right is overlayed with four callout boxes. Two callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. The first callout box is pointing to an area in the Delridge neighborhood and the text reads: “Social service provider.” The other callout box is pointing to the proposed Delridge Station on the cutaway section and the text reads: “Taller guideway and station.” One callout box has tree icon, indicating park effects. It is pointing to the West Seattle Golf Course and the text reads: “West Seattle Golf Course. 0.5 acres.” The final callout box has a house icon, indicating residential displacement. It is pointing at the proposed Alaska Junction station and the text reads: “Mixed-use apartment – 239 units.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Elevated 41st/42nd Ave Station - Dakota Street Station and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the route map utilized in the previous slide to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $2.0 billion. Row 2: 551 residential unit displacements. Row 3: 77 business displacements. Row 4: 0.6 acres of parkland permanently affected. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the table reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. Connection to preferred alternative in Duwamish is shown for illustration purposes. The map to the right is overlayed with five callout boxes. Two callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. The first callout box is pointing to an area in the Delridge neighborhood and the text reads: “Social service provider.” The other callout box is pointing to the proposed Delridge Station on the cutaway section and the text reads: “Taller guideway and station.” One callout box has tree icon, indicating park effects. It is pointing to the West Seattle Golf Course and the text reads: “West Seattle Golf Course. 0.5 acres.” The next callout box has a multi-story building icon, which indicates business displacement. It is pointing at the proposed Alaska Junction Station and the text reads: “Mixed-use commercial – 38.” The final callout box has a house icon, indicating residential displacement. It is pointing at an area in the Alaska Junction neighborhood and the text reads “Mixed-Use apartment – 216 units.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Tunnel 41st Avenue Station - Dakota Street Station Lower Height and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the route map utilized in the previous slide to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $2.1 billion. Row 2: 364 residential displacements. Row 3: 31 business displacements. Row 4: 1.4 acres of parkland permanently affected. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the table reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. Connection to preferred alternative in Duwamish is shown for illustration purposes. The map to the right is overlayed with five callout boxes. Three callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. The first callout box is pointing to an area in the Delridge neighborhood and the text reads: “Social service provider.” The second callout box is floating on the map and the text reads: “Two tunnel stations.” The third callout box is pointing to the proposed Delridge Station on the cutaway section and the text reads: “Taller guideway and station.” One callout box has tree icon, indicating park effects. It is pointing to the West Seattle Golf Course and the text reads: “West Seattle Golf Course. 1.4 acres.” The final callout box has a house icon, indicating residential displacement. It is pointing at an area just south of the proposed Alaska Junction station and the text reads: “Apartment building – 90 units.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Tunnel 42nd Ave Station - Dakota Street Station Lower Height and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the route map utilized in the previous slide to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $2.2 billion. Row 2: 321 residential unit displacements. Row 3: 60 business displacements. Row 4: 1.6 acres of parkland permanently affected. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the table reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. Connection to preferred alternative in Delridge is shown for illustration purposes The map to the right is overlayed with six callout boxes. Three callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. The first callout box is pointing to an area in the Delridge neighborhood and the text reads: “Social service provider.” The second callout box is floating on the map and the text reads: “Two tunnel stations.” The third callout box is pointing to the proposed Delridge Station on the cutaway section and the text reads: “Taller guideway and station.” Two callout boxes have a tree icon, indicating park effects. One callout box is pointing to the West Seattle Golf Course and the text reads: “West Seattle Golf Course. 1.4 acres.” The other callout box is pointing to the proposed Alaska Junction Station and the text reads: “Junction Plaza Park – 0.2 acres.” The final callout box has a multi-story building icon, indicating business displacement. It is also pointing at the proposed Alaska Junction station and the text reads: “Mixed-use commercial – 38.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Short Tunnel 41st Avenue Station – Dakota Street Station and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the route map utilized in the previous slide to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.9 billion. Row 2: 410 residential unit displacements. Row 3: 34 business displacements. Row 4: 0.5 acres of parkland permanently affected. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the table reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. Connection to preferred alternative in Delridge is shown for illustration purposes. The map to the right is overlayed with five callout boxes. Three callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. The first callout box is pointing to an are just north of the proposed Delridge Station and the text reads: “Social service provider.” The second callout box is floating in the Alaska Junction neighborhood and the text reads: “Tunnel station.” The third callout box is pointing to the proposed Delridge Station on the cutaway section and the text reads: “Taller guideway and station.” one callout box has a house icon, indicating residential displacement. It is pointing to the proposed Alaska Junction Station and the text reads: “Apartment building – 90 units.” The final callout box has a tree icon, indicating park effects. It is pointing at the West Seattle Golf Course and the text reads: “West Seattle Golf Course.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Medium Tunnel 41st Avenue Station – Andover Street Station Lower Height and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the route map utilized in the previous slide to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.6 billion. Row 2: 201 residential unit displacements. Row 3: 35 business displacements. Row 4: No parkland permanently affected. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the table reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. Connection to preferred alternative in Delridge is shown for illustration purposes. The map to the right is overlayed with seven callout boxes. Four callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. The first callout box is pointing to the proposed Delridge Station and the text reads: “Delridge Station further north.” The second callout box is pointing to a segment of the proposed route between the proposed Avalon and Delridge Stations and the text reads: “Guideway follows West Seattle Bridge.” The third callout box is floating in the Alaska Junction neighborhood and the text reads: “Tunnel station.” The fourth callout box is pointing to the proposed Delridge Station on the cutaway section and the text reads: “Taller guideway and station.” Two callout boxes have a house icon, indicating residential displacement. The first box is at an area just south of the proposed Alaska Junction Station and the text reads: “Apartment building – 90 units.” The second box is pointing at a segment of the proposed route between Avalon and Delridge along Andover Street and the text reads: “Social service provider – 31 units.” The final callout box has a multi-story building icon, indicating business displacement. It is pointing at an area just south of the proposed Delridge Station and the text reads: “Business Park – 14.” — 點擊放大

The slide is labeled Elevated Fauntleroy Way Station – Andover Street Station and includes a single column table with five rows on the left and the route map utilized in the previous slide to the right, with a cross-section cutaway below. The table has the following information. Row 1: Project cost (2019 in billions) is $1.5 billion. Row 2: 487 residential unit displacements. Row 3: 34 business displacements. Row 4: No parkland permanently affected. Row 5: Other considerations. Text below the table reads: Diagrams are not to scale and all measurements are appropriate. The above information is for illustration only. Please refer to DEIS for further detail. Connection to preferred alternative in Delridge is shown for illustration purposes. The map to the right is overlayed with five callout boxes. Three callout boxes have a magnifying glass icon, which indicates other project considerations. The first callout box is pointing to the proposed Delridge Station and the text reads: “Delridge Station further north.” The second callout box is pointing to a segment of the proposed route between the proposed Avalon and Delridge Stations and the text reads: “Guideway follows Avalon Way SW.” The third callout box is pointing to the proposed Delridge Station on the cutaway section and the text reads: “Taller guideway and station.” The next callout box has a house icon, indicating residential displacement. It is pointing at the proposed Alaska Junction Station and the text reads: “Mixed-use apartment – 239 units.” The final callout box has a multi-story building icon, indicating business displacement. It is pointing at an area just south of the proposed Delridge Station and the text reads: “Business Park – 14.” — 點擊放大

我們該如何抵達此階段？

Two people stand in front of a large map of the Seattle area, featuring existing and future Sound Transit service lines. — 2016年11月: 選民批准編列Sound Transit3號議案預算，此預算案使輕軌延長62英哩，增設的車站增加了37個服務區域，區域運輸系統綿延116英哩。本預算案亦將快速公共運輸系統 (Bus Rapid Transit, BRT) (東區) 納入，不僅提高Sounder South沿線的運能，也增加各種出行模式與停靠站之間轉運的便利性。

Eight people sit together around a table viewing a large map. Several people are pointing to the map. — 2017年10月: Sound Transit召聘了一個顧問團協助West Seattle/Ballard Link擴展項目的規劃、初期設計與環評。

A group of about 35 individuals sit around various tables inside the Sound Transit Board Room, in conversation with each other and looking at project materials. — 2018年1月/2月: Sound Transit召開第一場持份者諮詢小組與特選領導團動員大會，概要介紹項目並說明開發階段的備選方案。

A person writes a comment on a sheet of paper adjacent to a comment collection box next to informational materials about West Seattle alternatives. — 2018年2月-3月: Sound Transit與FTA共同舉辦的初步選址現場諮詢會以及諮詢期，目的在於廣納民眾對於經選民批准的Sound Transit3號議案項目有何意見，並匯集有關其他路線與車站位置備選方案的各方新點子。

A person stands adjacent two large screens that read “Alternatives development overview” speaking into a microphone presenting to a crowd of people in a large room. — 2018年3月–2019年4月: Sound Transit會針對技術以及民意和持份者諮詢小組、特選領導團和Sound Transit 委員會的意見進行綜合評估之後開發及改良備選方案。本項目歷經2階段評估 (「初步選址」與「選址」)，可進一步改良備選方案。

A group of people are sitting in rows inside a large room, facing the presenter who is standing at a podium. — 2019年2月-3月: Sound Transit與FTA共同舉辦的選址現場諮詢會以及諮詢期，目的在於廣納民眾對於《環境影響報告草案》(EIS草案) 中備選方案待研議之日期及主題所提出的意見。

A group of 15 or more people sit along a large U-shaped table in formal attire in a large room with name plaques in front of them. A screen projector at the far end of the room reads, “West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions”. A singular person sits in the center of the room and separate from the U-shaped table. — 2019年5月: Sound Transit 委員會檢討備選方案、評估結果、民意以及特選領導團提出之建議後，確定《環境影響報告草案》中待研議的首選方案與其他備選方案。

A Link light rail train pulls into a station. Passengers wait on the platform for the train. — 2019年5月-10月: 在Sound Transit 委員會提出《環境影響報告草案》中待研議的首選方案與其他備選方案後，他們也會請工作人員針對選址公開評論會召開期間建議的其他路線和車站方案進行初步評估，以便確定是否應將其列在《環境影響報告草案》中進一步研議。

Two people stand in front of a large informational sign that reads “West Seattle, Ballard” that includes information about the project inside a large venue. There is a large group of people in the background who are looking at other project materials. — 2019年5月–2021年12月: Sound Transit的環評團隊所研擬的《環境影響報告草案》旨在說明多項正在考量中的備選方案以及各備選方案在建設過程中和竣工後營運時可能對輕軌沿線的自然環境以及人造環境和運輸系統造成何種影響。

A Sound Transit employee stands and talks to two people visiting the project booth at an outdoor event. — 2021年8月: 2020年年初，該委員會發起了一項重新調整程序，目的在於檢討大幅支付價差的解決辦法，此價差會影響尚未開始施工的交通擴展項目。根據目前的收益預測和費用估算，該委員會採行的計畫如下：

最早可在2032年開通從SODO到Alaska Junction路段的運輸服務。

最早可在2037年開通到Smith Cove (包括第二條市區隧道) 路段的運輸服務。

最早可在2039年開通到Ballard路段的運輸服務。

如需進一步了解重新調整會對交通擴展項目有何影響，請瀏覽Sound Transit的網站。

A Zoom meeting screenshot with thirteen people visible. — 2021年11月: Sound Transit啟動四個社區諮詢小組，以與整個沿線的社區成員共同審查和討論《環境影響報告草案》的結果。會議採用在線形式，並對公眾開放。

A man riding a light rail train looks down at his phone. — 2022年1月: 《環境影響報告草案》公佈，可供民眾查看並提出意見。開放給民眾90天的時間查看此文件並提出意見。我們透過寄至本項目的電子郵件、郵寄、語音信箱、意見表等形式受理民眾意見，民眾也可以親身前往現場諮詢會表達己見。欲知完整詳情，請見此處。

Six people stand around a table with multiple informational materials in a large room filled with people. One of the six points to a sticky note with a pencil, and the others look to it contemplatively. — 2022年6月: 在檢討《環境影響報告草案》的分析和公眾意見後，Sound Transit 委員會或確認或修改首選方案與車站位置。當他們考量要建設哪一個備選方案時，民意絕對是不可或缺的一環要素。

Five people gather around a table looking at informational materials outdoors. — 2023年: 首選方案和其他《環境影響報告草案》備選方案以及接獲之《環境影響報告草案》相關意見都會列入《環境影響報告終案》中。然後，Sound Transit 委員會會選出即將建設的項目。

Previous Next

Further studies

進一步研究

總覽

A person participating in a stickering exercise at a CID workshop.

經過2022年7月至2023年2月這段時間的進一步研究，Sound Transit委員會確定了Ballard Link擴展項目的首選方案。我們正努力在網站上更新項目資訊，以反映最新的委員會動議。同時，請閱讀委員會動議與新聞稿。

為加深對進一步研究的了解，請閱讀 2022 年 7 月及之後的委員會動議。如需獲取成果概覽，請閱讀執行摘要和報告或進一步研究參與摘要。在下方分段列出了每項進一步研究的相關說明和重要成果。

在Ballard Extension的唐人街-國際區 (Chinatown International District, CID)

在Ballard Extension的唐人街-國際區 (Chinatown International District, CID) 路段，Sound Transit委員會要求進行進一步研究，並要求社區和機構合作夥伴參與其中，共同聚焦淺層CID方案，從而：

- 力求解決遺留問題、盡量減少潛在影響並盡可能提高社區效益。

- 探索如何為所有模式打造一個整合、連接良好的樞紐，探討提升載客量和通暢性的機會、如何為Union車站和廣場引流或調整其用途，以及籌資和成本節約機會。

- 包含社區和機構合作夥伴要求的研究概念，包括但不限於定義4th Avenue淺層隧道方案，其目標為盡可能提高效益，同時盡量降低成本和影響。

我們希望盡早調動社區，形成我們進一步研究的範圍，並將社區的意見融入研究過程，在整個研究期間促成反復、包容且有意義的互動。了解關於我們的參與流程的更多資訊。

考慮到研究的複雜性（諸如此類的遺留項目在社區中推行卻並未讓社區參與其中），同時我們有意支持CID車站區域附近有意義的社區參與活動，Sound Transit和City of Seattle正組織一系列會議，以增加許多其他的參與方式，從而集中觸達CID和Pioneer Square附近的社區。

敬請出席下列任一或所有會議，共同出謀劃策。所有會議均在Union車站舉行，提供粵語、普通話和越南語口譯服務及翻譯資料。提供茶點。會後將在線上發佈所有會議資料。

透過五場公開會議和兩項線上調查，社區成員發表了對於CID唐人街/國際區 (Chinatown-International District, CID) 外的車站位置和調整第四大道淺層備選方案的看法，還提供了其他一些關於城市設計和場所維護的意見。會議與線上調查的參與者針對下列面向提出了疑問並分享了看法：機會和問題、會讓誰受益、會對誰施加負擔、各種構思如何為社區目標提供支援。如需了解詳細資訊，請參閱進一步研究部分下方的會議資料和社區回饋意見摘要。

為了為Sound Transit委員會之後可能採取的行動提供依據，請詳閱以下資訊，並分享您對於CID進一步研究的看法。更多資訊請參閱調查文件和CID進一步調查報告。
新路線和車站位置
1. CID以北的車站
2. CID以南的車站
3. CID以北的車站和CID以南的車站
啟動聯合車站和廣場

更多資訊請參閱調查文件和CID進一步調查報告。

改良的第四大道淺層 (CID-1a)

A map of the proposed 4th Ave Shallow Alternative, which explores station and alignment options to maximize community benefits while minimizing costs and impact.

「改良《環境影響報告草案》第四大道淺層(CID-1a) 備選方案」探索車站位置和路線方案，以期在盡可能降低成本和減輕影響的同時最大程度造福社區。

Icon公寓搬遷的時間可從4年縮短至兩個分別為期2個月的階段
透過一系列策略減輕施工噪音和對空氣品質的影響
減輕對BNSF的潛在影響，但需將施工時間延長1年（最多12年）
將封閉第四大道部分路段的持續時間縮短1年
預計成本：$31億（Pike與Holgate之間）
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加7億美元（不包括1億美元的特殊軌道工程）

CID以北的車站

「CID以北的新路線和車站位置」基於社區與合作機構的意見，探索靠近第四大道以東的Pioneer Square車站的車站和路線方案。

調查發現：

整合Midtown和CID車站
可促進與Madison BRT的交通整合
搬遷金郡行政大樓和社會服務辦公點
合理的公共交通導向型開發 (Equitable Transit-Oriented Development, eTOD) 機會
避免CID內的車站施工直接中斷
於Pioneer Square車站實現直接轉乘
臨時關閉James St 4年，並於施工期間將架空線移位
前往以下地點只需步行10分鐘：CID、Pioneer Square、Colman Dock和Downtown/Midtown南端
預計成本：20.5億美元（Pike與Holgate之間）
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：縮減3.6億美元

CID以南的車站

A map of the proposedNew alignment and station location North of the CID explores station and alignment options close to Pioneer Square Station, east of 4th Avenue based on ideas from community and agency partners.

啟動聯合車站和廣場 基於社區與合作機構的其他意見，探索Seattle Blvd S以南的南第六大道下的車站和路線方案。

調查發現：

避免CID內的車站施工直接中斷
eTOD機會
步行10分鐘抵達CID和體育場
無法實現直接轉乘
有限的繞道路線；關閉Seattle Blvd以南的第六大道
預計成本：25億美元（Pike與Holgate之間
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加8000萬美元

CID以北的車站和CID 以南的車站

A map of the proposed new alignment and station location South of the CID.

「CID以南和以北的新路線和車站位置」基於社區與合作機構的其他意見，探索CID以北（靠近第四大道以東的Pioneer Square車站）和CID以南（Seattle Blvd S以南的南第六大道下）的車站路線方案。

調查發現：

避免CID內的車站施工直接中斷
eTOD機會
步行10分鐘抵達CID和體育場
無法實現直接轉乘
有限的繞道路線；關閉Seattle Blvd以南的第六大道
預計成本：25億美元（Pike與Holgate之間
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加1.6億美元

啟動聯合車站和廣場

A map of the proposed Union Station and plaza activation concepts explores options to activate and/or modify uses of Union Station and the adjacent plaza

「啟動聯合車站和廣場的構思」探索為激活聯合車站及相鄰廣場和/或調整其用途的方案。所示構思是將第四大道淺層車站的一個入口設在聯合車站大廳。如果有其他方案，會出於其他社區用途來規劃將該區域。

調查發現：

設計與管理對於公眾安全的關鍵價值t
社區對於投資於歷史悠久的車站和周邊廣場的支持
用途和各類活動，包括出行、商業和社區活動

概述CID內近期的公眾參與和資源

啟動現場諮詢會（2022年10月13日）

超過200人參加了在Union車站舉行的啟動現場諮詢會，以了解有關進一步研究的更多資訊，並提供回饋意見或想法，從而幫助我們制定參與方式和今後數月的研究範圍。同時還為無法親身參加現場諮詢會的人士提供了參與線上問卷調查的機會。

會議資料：

概要：

CID研討會（第1場）– 方案（2022年11月2日）

基於我們在啟動現場諮詢會和線上問卷調查中收到的回饋意見，我們的第一場研討會側重於有待進一步研究的方案。我們提出了社區與我們分享的構思，並開始共同探索機遇和挑戰。

會議資料：

為及早參與社區、確定進一步的研究範圍並告知參與過程，項目團隊在研究期間舉行了一系列會議：

CID研討會（第2場）– 權衡（2022年11月16日）–

基於我們在啟動現場諮詢會和第1場研討會上收到的回饋意見和疑問，本場研討會發起了關於權衡的會談。我們分享了我們所知的有待進一步研究之方案相關最新資訊，包括某些潛在的影響和效益，並且收集了大家對於權衡和潛在調整方式的回饋意見。目前正在開展第1場和第2場研討會相關內容的線上問卷調查。

CID研討會（第3場）– 關鍵問題（2022年12月14日）

我們誠邀您出席我們的下一場研討會，重點關注社區成員提出的關鍵問題。我們將著重探討關鍵問題的解決方案，以及每項方案的潛在緩解措施。

CID研討會（第3場）

12月14日（星期三）中午11:30.
11:30 a.m. – Do中午12:00至下午2:00 — 研討會
Union Station, 401 S. Jackson Street, Seattle

您可向Leda Chahim申請預留席位 leda.chahim@soundtransit.org.

會議資料

CID研討會（第4場）– 總結（2023年1月5日）

我們匯集了過往研討會的經驗以及社區反饋，開始為Sound Transit委員會收集您的寶貴意見。

請關注下場研討會的舉行日期，按時參加。臨近會議日期時，我們會分享更多詳細資訊。 CID研討會（第4場） 1月5日（星期四）下午4:30
CID研討會（第4場）
5-7 p.m. - Workshop
Union Station, 401 S. Jackson Street, Seattle

會議資料

Ballard Link 擴展: Downtown區

A map with six call-out boxes that highlight further studies in the downtown segment.

在Downtown路段的Midtown車站，委員會指示工作人員探索減小車站深度、改善乘客通道及改良車站入口的機會。作為潛在的成本節約措施，工作人員還將研究可能在Midtown和Denny車站（將入口改向公共路權）和Westlake（合併車站入口）實施的車站入口調整方案。

委員會還指示工作人員探究將Westlake/5th Avenue車站與Denny/Terry車站連接至South Lake Union/Harrison車站的方案，並探索在Denny Street兩側到Denny/Terry車站之間設立車站通道的機會。

工作人員將在Seattle Center附近探究將South Lake Union/Harrison車站與Seattle Center/Mercer車站連接至任一北向隧道入口位置的方案。工作人員還將探究將Seattle Center Republican車站向西移動的方案。

並分享您對於Downtown進一步研究的看法。更多資訊詳見Downtown報告。

South Lake Union: 混合搭配
Seattle Center: 混合搭配
Seattle Center: Republican 西移

我們還研究了對位於Downtown區段的車站入口進行的額外調整。

Denny Station: Entrance on both sides of Denny
車站出入口的改良
1. Midtown車站 (DT-1)：Columbia Street路權
2. Midtown車站 (DT-1)：第四大道路權
3. Denny車站 (DT-1)：Lenora Street路權
4. Denny車站 (DT-1)：第八大道路權
5. Westlake車站 (DT-1)：出入口整合

並分享您對於Downtown進一步研究的看法。更多資訊詳見Downtown報告。

「South Lake Union：混合搭配

對比第五大道/ Harrison備選方案 (DT-1)

「South Lake Union：混合搭配」連通Westlake/第五大道車站 (DT-1)、Denny/Terry車站 (DT-2) 和South Lake Union/Harrison車站 (DT-1)。此構思探索避免在施工期間臨時關閉西雅圖街車服務的方案。

調查發現:

避免臨時關閉西雅圖街車
高風險長距離光纖搬遷，將項目整體延遲控制在1年以內
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加2億美元

「Seattle Center：混合搭配」

對比首選的第五大道 / Harrison備選方案 (DT-1)

「Seattle Center：混合搭配」連通South Lake Union/Harrison車站 (DT-1)、Seattle Center/Mercer車站 (DT-2)和任一北向隧道入口位置。此構思探索避免施工在Seattle Center附近造成影響的方案。

調查發現:

因營運問題，連接至Republican入口位置不切實際
避免施工在NW Rooms附近造成影響
關閉Mercer Street部分路段，會對交通造成影響
15項額外的住宅搬遷和24項額外的店鋪搬遷
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加2.1億美元

「Seattle Center：Republican西移」

對比首選的第五大道/ Harrison備選方案 (DT-1)

A map of the Seattle Center Republican Station west.

「Seattle Center：Republican西移」將Seattle Center Republican車站向西移動。此構思探索避免在Seattle Center附近施工的方案。

調查發現:

臨時關閉Republican St，最大程度減少對交通的影響
擴展Republican上的明挖覆蓋施工範圍
避免施工在NW Rooms附近造成影響
可緩解對Uptown電影院造成的噪音和振動影響
8項額外的店鋪搬遷
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加6000萬美元

「 Denny雙側均設入口」

對比首選的第五大道 / Harrison備選方案 (DT-1)

「 Denny雙側均設入口」探索從Denny Street雙側進入車站並改善乘客通行順暢度的機會。

縮短前往Westlake Ave上的西雅圖街車和巴士搭乘點的步行距離
永久縮窄Terry Ave，最大程度減少對交通的影響
減少物業收購和搬遷

成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加1.9億美元（包括南聯合湖區 (South Lake Union, SLU)混合搭配）

「Midtown車站：Columbia Street路權」

對比首選的第五大道 / Harrison備選方案 (DT-1)

A map of proposed changes to Midtown Station: Columbia Street

「Midtown車站：Columbia Street路權」探索將車站入口移至設有公共路權處，以降低成本和進度風險並改善乘客體驗。

調查發現:

降低改動現有建築的風險
永久縮窄Columbia St，最大程度減少對交通的影響
增設自動扶梯通道，改善乘客體驗（當與更淺層的CID車站連通時）
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加3000萬美元

「Midtown車站：第四大道路權」

對比首選的第五大道 / Harrison備選方案 (DT-1)

A map of proposed changes to Midtown Station: 4th Avenue right-of-way

「Midtown車站：第四大道路權」探索將車站入口移至公共路權處位置，以降低成本和進度風險。

調查發現:

施工期間將第四大道臨時縮窄至單車道，會對交通和運輸造成較大影響
將第四大道永久縮窄至雙車道，會對交通造成較小影響
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：縮減2000萬美元

Denny車站：Lenora Street路權

對比首選的第五大道 / Harrison備選方案 (DT-1)

「Denny車站：Lenora Street路權」探索將車站入口移至公共路權處，以降低成本。

調查發現:

降低開發風險
永久關閉Lenora St，最大程度減少對交通的影響
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：縮減2000萬美元

「Denny車站：8th Avenue路權」

對比首選的第五大道 / Harrison備選方案 (DT-1)

「Denny車站：8th Avenue路權」探索將車站入口移至設有公共路權處，以降低成本。

調查發現:

降低開發風險
永久縮窄第八大道，最大程度減少對交通的影響
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：縮減6000萬美元

「Westlake車站：入口整合」

對比首選的第五大道 / Harrison備選方案 (DT-1)

「Westlake車站：入口整合」探索將車站入口移至公共路權處，以降低成本並改善乘客體驗。

調查發現:

預計第四大道車道需要關閉
減少4項店鋪搬遷
因垂直流通(樓梯/升降機/自動梯扶)增加冗餘
為一體化聯合開發提供機會
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：縮減5000萬美元

Ballard Link 擴展: Interbay/Ballard 區

Ballard-South Interbay — 在Interbay-Ballard路段的South Interbay地區，委員會指示工作人員探究將隧道入口向南移動的方案。委員會還讓工作人員探索解決沿Elliott Avenue的導軌問題的機會，以及對Interbay物業的潛在影響，包括合併Smith Cove和Interbay車站的方案。

A map with three call-out boxes that highlight further studies in the Interbay/Ballard area. — 在Interbay-Ballard路段的Ballard社區，委員會指示工作人員開展以下研究：與Tunnel 14th Avenue車站方案相關的跨15th Avenue的行人通道改善措施。車站通道和安全性，包括MarketStreet的北部和南部。與Tunnel 15th Avenue車站方案相關的成本節約機會和潛在的第三方資金需求。改變Tunnel 14th Avenue的路線，作為潛在的成本節約措施。

Previous Next

為了為Sound Transit委員會之後可能採取的行動提供依據，請詳閱以下資訊，並分享您對於Interbay / Ballard進一步研究的看法。. 更多資訊詳見Ballard報告 / Interbay報告。如需了解關於近期公眾參與的詳細資訊，請參閱進一步研究部分下方的會議資料和回饋意見摘要。

South Interbay:

South Interbay segment station and alignment

Ballard:

15th Avenue隧道成本節約：《環境影響報告草案》車站位置
15th Avenue隧道成本節約：車站移至設有路權處
15th Avenue隧道車站設於Market以北的入口
14th Avenue隧道車站通道
轉移14Avenue隧道車站

Interbay南部修改後的SIB-1路線

對比首選的Galer Street車站/Interbay中部的備選方案 (SIB-1) 和首選的 14^th/15^th Avenue 隧道備選方案 (IBB-2a/b)

Map of Ballard and Interbay stations in northwest Seattle showing a pink line for preferred alternatives, brown lines for preferred alternatives with third party funding, and blue lines for other Draft EIS alternatives. Lines indicate elevated, at-grade and tunnel alternatives. See text description below for additional details.

Interbay南部修改後的SIB-1路線將Interbay車站向南移動，以跨越Dravus St，從而避開Seattle City Light變電所和Seattle Storm物業。

在Dravus Street雙側增加車站入口
減少20項店鋪搬遷
Dravus車道臨時關閉1.5年
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：縮減3000萬美元

Interbay南部改良後的SIB-3路線

對比Prospect Street車站/Interbay中部的備選方案 (SIB-3)與首選的隧道 14^th/15^th Avenue (IBB-2a/b)

Map of Ballard and Interbay proposed 15th Avenue transit station in right-of-way.

Interbay南部修改後的SIB-3路線將北入口位置向南移動，並將Smith Cove車站從Magnolia Bridge向北移動，從而避開Queen Anne山坡上不穩定的邊坡風險，並避開Seattle City Light變電站和Seattle Storm物業。

Findings:

eTOD 的公共合作機會
在Dravus Street兩側增加車站入口
Dravus臨時車道封閉1.5年
移動的入口位置不符合實際情況
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：不適用

整合路線方案

對比首選Galer Street車站/Interbay中部的備選方案 (SIB-1)與首選 14^th Avenue 高架備選方案 (IBB-1a)

Map of Ballard and Interbay proposed consolidated alignment plan.

整合路線方案 將Smith Cove和Interbay 車站與低於坡度的路線合併，以避免Elliott Avenue上的導軌問題及Queen Anne山坡上不穩定的邊坡風險，並避開Seattle City Light變電站和Seattle Storm物業。

Findings:

15th Ave臨時車道封閉1.5年
整合至一個車站會降低通暢性，但載客量損失較小
對Queen Anne山坡不穩定邊坡風險的持續分析
延長的隧道路線
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）： 2.1億美元

15th Avenue隧道成本節省：《環境影響報告草案》車站

對比 15^th Avenue隧道車站首選方案(IBB-2b)

15th Avenue隧道成本節省：《環境影響報告草案》車站 位置縮小東側車站入口，取消南側入口，從而降低成本。

Findings:

也有可能縮小西側入口的面積
避免搬遷Safeway店鋪，減少eTOD機會
減少建設儲備用地
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加7000萬美元（或增加3000萬美元，可選擇較小的西側入口）

Tunnel 15th Avenue Cost Savings: Station in Right-of-Way

對比 15^th隧道車站首選方案(IBB-2b)

15th Avenue隧道成本節省：擁有路權的車站移至 進行車站建設，並取消南側入口，從而降低成本。

Findings:

減少南側通道
也有可能縮小西側入口的面積
建設期間臨時封閉交叉路口
避免搬遷 Safeway店鋪，減少eTOD機會
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加7000萬美元（或增加3000萬美元，可選擇較小的西側入口

Market以北的15th Avenue隧道入口在公共路權的東北角

對比 15^th隧道車站首選方案(IBB-2b)

Market以北的15th Avenue隧道入口在公共路權的東北角增加車站入口，改善乘客通往北側的通道。

Findings:

將15th Ave的7條車道減少至5條車道
15th Ave臨時封閉至少2年成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加2億美元

隧道一第四大道車站通道

對比隧道15^th車站首選方案(IBB-2b)

隧道一第四大道車站通道 隧道一第四大道車站通道包含 15th Ave與隧道 14th車站間的行人通道的改善措施，從而改善乘客前往西側的通道。

Findings:

地面改善可能會減少行人出行時間，但對交通與公交運營的影響較小
改善架空或地底過路處可能會增加出行時間，但會減少乘客與車輛的互動
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：
- 增加50萬-100萬美元用於地面改善
- 增加0.2-1億美元用於改善架空或地底過路處

轉移14th Avenue隧道車站

對比 14^th隧道車站首選方案(IBB-2b)

轉移14th Avenue隧道車站 將隧道路線向東移動，並取消西側入口以降低成本。

Findings:

避免搬遷Safeway及減少eTOD機會
如從西側進入，則需其他街道交叉路口
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：縮減1.4億美元

Interbay/Ballard現場諮詢會（2022年12月12日）

超過70人參加 Lawton小學的現場諮詢會，以了解West Seattle和 Ballard Link擴展項目的 Interbay/Ballard部分正在研究的新概念並提供反饋。同時還為無法親身參加12月23日現場諮詢會的人士提供了線上問卷調查的機會。

會議資料
Higher resolution concept images can be found here.

Interbay/Ballard研討會（2023年1月11日）

在此次活動中，我們分享了我們在Interbay和Ballard地區開展的進一步研究的其他進展更新與部分成果。針對Interbay，我們在12月12日的現場研討會分享了三個潛在路線概念的更多資訊。針對 Ballard，我們分享了一直在研究的隧道 14th Ave與隧道 15th Ave車站方案相關的潛在成本節約與通道改善的資訊與調查發現。

會議資料

除確定West Seattle Extension的首選方案外

A map with three call-out boxes that highlight further studies in West Seattle.

針對West Seattle Link Extension，Sound Transit委員會確定了以下首選方案：West Seattle Junction路段的中層隧道41st Avenue車站備選方案、Delridge路段的Andover Street車站降低高度備選方案、Duwamish路段的南向交叉備選方案，以及SODO路段的地面備選方案交錯車站配置。

除確定West Seattle Extension的首選方案外，委員會還指示工作人員：

研究將Alaska Junction車站的車站入口移至42nd Avenue SW，並取消Avalon車站的方案，作為潛在的成本節約措施。
探索在Delridge車站提供通往Andover Street北側和南側的機會，包括橫跨Andover Street的人行天橋或將路線向南移至車站以西的SW Yancy Street。
探索增加從SODO車站月台到S. Lander Street的暢通性的機會，並根據2022年9月和11月的其他委員會要求，尋找機會避免或盡量減少對當地企業的影響。

此外，委員會還指示工作人員進一步研究以下潛在的成本節約設想方案：

在West Seattle Junction路段，取消Avalon車站。

根據委員會的指示，項目團隊繼續研究West Seattle Link 擴展項目的其他改良方案。研究工作將在持續開展的項目開發中繼續進行。

有關進一步研究工作的更多資訊可在下方和West Seattle Link擴展項目報告中查看。

請時刻關注，以了解未來的參與機會。

調查發現：

Alaska Junction車站通道調整
Delridge通道、整合和路線調整
取消Avalon車站
SODO至S Lander Street通道

Alaska Junction車站通道調整

對比41st Avenue中程隧道車站 (WSJ-5)

Map of proposed Alaska Junction station access refinement shifts to station entrance 42nd Avenue SW to improve passenger access.

Alaska Junction車站通道調整措施將車站入口移至42nd Avenue SW，以改善乘客進出通道。

調查發現:

新增90個公平的TOD住房單元
消除對41st Ave SW行人交叉路口的需求
減少39項住宅搬遷與32項額外的店鋪搬遷
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加8000萬美元

Delridge通道連接、整合和路線調整

對比較低高度Andover Street車站備選方案 (DEL-6)

Map of proposed Delridge access, integration and alignment refinement, which shifts alignment south towards SW Yancy Steet to improve passenger access and transit integration and reduce effects to organizations serving low-income and communities of color.

Delridge通道連接、整合和路線調整措施將路線向南移至SW Yancy Steet，以改善乘客通道和交通整合，並減少對服務於低收入與有色人種社區的組織的影響。

調查發現:

減少14項住宅搬遷與3項額外的店鋪搬遷
消除潛在的客運與貨運衝突
永久封閉32nd Ave
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：增加5000萬美元

取消Avalon車站取消車站並優化路線，從而降低成本。

對比較低高度Andover Street車站備選方案 (DEL-6)與41st Avenue中程隧道車站備選方案 (WSJ-5)

Map of the area around Avalon Station, which in the proposed scenario would be elimainated to optimize alignment and reduce costs.

取消Avalon車站取消車站並優化路線，從而降低成本。

調查發現:

減少48項住宅搬遷和減少3項店鋪搬遷
靠近DEIS Avalon車站的乘客出行時間更長
預計項目載客量不會減少
減少臨時與永久性道路封閉
成本（與重新調整的財務計劃相比）：縮減8000萬美元

SODO通往S Lander Street

對比地面備選方案 (SODO-1a) 車站交錯佈局

Map of the proposed SODO access to S Lander Street, which enhances access from platform to S Lander Street to minimize property effects on west side of station and add connection to S Lander Street.

SODO通往S Lander Street可改善從月台至S Lander Street的通道連接，以最大限度地減少對車站西側的物業影響，並增加與S Lander Street的連接。

調查發現:

直接連接至Lander Street行車天橋
減少從南第四大道直達的車站通道
減少對車站西側的物業影響
無預計成本變動

參與調查

在2022年7月28日至2023年2月23日進一步研究期間，已在社區參與活動中收集了社區回饋。詳情請見進一步研究社區參與摘要。

車站規劃

我們正在研究各社區的多個車站備選方案。研究的其中一部分，是了解各車站如何透過步行、自行車、公車，和其他交通工具的連接。我們夥伴City of Seattle和當地社區提出可達度、連接性和城市設計的初步概念。點擊下方的車站和車站橫截面，理解規劃和草案中所研究各備選方案的潛在車站出入口，以及供人們步行、騎車、自行車和乘坐公共交通公具的連接點。

我們從社區收集的意見

Sound Transit在2019年秋季舉辦了一系列社區論壇和網上公開諮詢會，並就下列問題徵求了意見：

您如何評價您現在所在的社區？
輕軌車站如何才能為您的社區提供最好的服務？
您社區的居民需要前往的主要目的地有哪些？您的日常活動範圍是？
您是如何從社區範圍內前往這些目的地的？
將來您去到車站時，您希望車站及其附近包含哪些部分？

請查看概要 (24MB PDF)，瞭解我們收集的意見之詳細資訊。

車站規劃進展報告

Sound Transit、City of Seattle 、King County Metro 和其他機構合作夥伴如Port of Seattle 在 2020 年至 2021 年為《環境影響報告草案》車站備選方案進行評估，並對收集到的社區優先事項提供想法和建議。這項工作在車站規劃進展報告中進行了總結和介紹，我們將與《環境影響報告草案》一起發佈，以進一步幫助社區了解不同備選方案的機會和挑戰。查看進展報告以了解更多細節（連結如下）。

車站規劃期間，Sound Transit有哪些考慮？

為讓公車換乘輕軌變得更加便利

將公車站設置於車站出入口盡可能最近位置。
盡量減少主要街道的過路處，或研究改進措施，以提高交過路處的安全性。

讓步行、騎車或騎自行車到達車站和在車站附近活動變得更加便利

將車站出入口設於顯眼的位置，便於居民來往於社區和車站之間。
提供安全且獨立的自行車和步行路線，這些路線連接車站和社區。

支援車站周圍合理的公共交通導向型開發 (TOD)。進一步瞭解TOD。

探求未來合作發展的機會，優先開發經濟適用房和有益於社區的其他用途。

Sound Transit是如何與City of Seattle進行合作的？每個機構在項目中扮演著怎樣的角色？

Sound Transit和City of Seattle都扮演著重要的角色，以確保車站的成功建設。這些角色的分工不同，卻又相互依賴，使我們之間的緊密合作成為了車站規劃的關鍵。

車站

選擇您想要查看的車站地圖，和各車站備選方案的規劃，包括潛在出入口位置、連接車站的方法，和車站周邊公共空間的發展機會。

Chinatown-International District

加入社區諮詢團體

概述

我們研究了多條輕軌路線和多個車站位置（稱為備選方案），並且公眾獲得機會在2022年初的《環境影響報告草案》公眾諮詢期提供意見。

除了Sound Transit收到的關於《環境影響報告草案》的公眾意見外，本機構還成立了社區諮詢小組 (Community Advisory Group, CAG)，以提供另一個論壇，在我們努力按時按質按量交付項目時，與社區成員分享資訊，並就問題和權衡進行協作。在確認或修改WSBLE項目的首選方案之前，這些小組匯總的回饋意見，以及從公眾諮詢期收到的所有意見，都將提供給Sound Transit委員會。

架構和成員

我們成立的CAG擁有來自項目廊道沿線社區的各種經驗和觀點，包括但不限於收入水平、種族、年齡、身體和認知能力以及生活經驗。每個小組由10-15名社區成員組成，依照地理區域進行組織。

成員作為社區的大使，提出社區價值觀、關切事項和想法。參加會議的成員將獲得津貼，我們預計到2022年初可能會召開六次網上會議。

會議 #1 – 介紹

會議 #2 – 車站規劃

Interbay/Ballard 社區諮詢小組:
2022 年 1 月 5 日，下午 5:00-晚上7:00
Downtown 社區諮詢小組:
2022 年 1 月 6 日，下午 5:00-晚上7:00
West Seattle/Duwamish 社區諮詢小組:
2022 年 1 月 11 日，下午 5:00-晚上7:00
CID/SODO 社區諮詢小組:
2022 年 1 月 13 日，下午 5:00-晚上7:00

會議 #3 – EIS草案概覽

Interbay/Ballard 社區諮詢小組:
Wednesday, February 2, 2022 from 5pm to 7pm
Downtown 社區諮詢小組:
Thursday, February 3, 2022 from 5pm to 7pm
West Seattle/Duwamish 社區諮詢小組:
Tuesday, February 8, 2022 from 5pm to 7pm
CID/SODO 社區諮詢小組:
Wednesday, February 9, 2022 from 5pm to 7pm

會議 #4 – EIS草案深層研討

Interbay/Ballard 社區諮詢小組:
Tuesday, March 1, 2022 from 5pm to 7pm
Downtown社區諮詢小組:
Thursday, March 3, 2022 from 5pm to 7pm
West Seattle/Duwamish社區諮詢小組:
Tuesday, March 8, 2022 from 5pm to 7pm
CID/SODO 社區諮詢小組:
Thursday, March 10, 2022 from 5pm to 7pm

會議 #5 –《環境影響報告草案》,節省成本可能性, 優化方案 (2022年4月)

Interbay/Ballard 社區諮詢小組:
Tuesday, April 5, 2022 from 5pm to 7pm
- 議程
- 簡報
- 會議記錄
Downtown 社區諮詢小組:
Thursday, April 7, 2022 from 5pm to 7pm
- 議程
- 簡報
- 會議記錄
West Seattle/Duwamish 社區諮詢小組:
Tuesday, April 12, 2022 from 5pm to 7pm
- 議程
- 簡報
- 會議記錄
CID/SODO 社區諮詢小組:
Wednesday, April 13, 2022 from 5pm to 7pm
- 議程
- 簡報
- 會議記錄

會議 #6 – 綜合意見

Interbay/Ballard 社區諮詢小組:
2022 年 5 月 4 日，下午 5:00-晚上7:00
Downtown 社區諮詢小組:
2022 年 5 月 5 日，下午 5:00-晚上7:00
West Seattle/Duwamish 社區諮詢小組:
2022 年 5 月 10 日，下午 5:00-晚上7:00
CID/SODO 社區諮詢小組:
2022 年 5 月 12 日，下午 5:00-晚上7:00

物業持有者

爲規劃 West Seattle 和 Ballard Link 擴展項目專案，Sound Transit 將需要購買及使用私人地產。這可能致使人們面臨住宅或工作場所搬遷。

Sound Transit 房產收購程序公平對待受影響的業主和租戶，提供適當的合理補償 (Just Compensation) 和搬遷福利，儘量減少困境，並與所有相關方進行溝通。我們深知，重選定居地和工作場所對您而言可能存在困難；因此我們全程在此提供支援，對問題進行解答。

Sound Transit有具體的政策和程序，其中介紹了該機構在整個收購過程中將如何與業主和租戶合作。 Sound Transit 在我們的房產收購過程中遵循聯邦法律、州法律以及當地法律，更具體而言，遵循《統一協助搬遷和不動產收購政策法案》(the Uniform Relocation Assistanceand Real Property Acquisition Policies Act) 以及州法律。

物業收購時間表

2021 年中 EIS 前期草案發佈

Sound Transit聯絡可能受影響的業主

2022 年初* 環境影響報告草案發佈

環境影響報告草案可供公眾查閱及留言
Sound Transit委員會在公眾留言期結束後確認或修改首選方案

2023 年* 最終 EIS 發佈

Sound Transit委員會即將建設的項目

2023 年至 2027 年最終設計方案

Sound Transit 確認建造、營運和維護該系統所需的產權
Sound Transit委員會授權展開物業收購
Sound Transit將準備展開評估，以確認專案所需物業之公平市場價值
Sound Transit將為因該專案而搬遷的個人及企業提供搬遷補助，包括推介同類房產及支付搬遷費用補貼
Sound Transit員工將在此一過程全程為業主及租戶提供支援

由於達成最終決定仍須數年時間，我們理解在這段不確定時期可能面臨的壓力，並繼續為您提供協助。如有其他疑問或需要展開虛擬會議，請聯絡我們的外展團隊，電子信箱為 wsblink@soundtransit.org ，電話號碼為 206-903-7229.

常見問題解答

如果我的房產將受到影響，我何時會收到通知？

若 Sound Transit 明確表示我的房產可能受影響，接下來會如何？

可能受影響通知並不代表我們已決定購買您的房產。但此情形確實表示 Sound Transit 在此後的項目專案階段有可能需要收購您的房產。在逐步完善項目專案設計時，我們將持續更新可能受影響的房產清單。在環境影響報告終案發佈及 Sound Transit 委員會選定建築項目專案前，我們無法確定將購買的何處房產。

如果要求我搬遷，那麼我可以預期獲得何種搬遷援助？

住宅搬遷

Sound Transit 針對住宅業主和租戶提出了三種搬遷援助：諮詢援助、搬遷費用及替代性住房補償。有資歷的搬遷專家將同搬遷居民一起確定需求，向其解釋福利，提供當前的房屋庫存，並提供有關提出索賠的協助和建議。

商業搬遷

Sound Transit 提出了三種主要搬遷援助：諮詢援助、搬遷費用及重新設立營業場所補償。根據商業營運的複雜程度，遷離土地的每家企業的福利和諮詢服務水準可能有所不同。

收購過程是怎樣的？

在 Sound Transit 委員會選定建築項目專案後，Federal Transit Administration 將簽發立項確認函，委員會將授權沿項目專案路線收購房產。在該授權開始前，另需採取幾項步驟，包括：

準備房產資訊以供 Sound Transit 委員會審查。
確定收購的類型（即全部或部份收購、臨時或永久地役權）。
正式通知產權擁有者，其房產正在被 Sound Transit 委員會考慮收購，並提供委員會擬議的授權收購的會議日期。工作人員將於 Sound Transit 委員會會議日前通知業主，在該會議中將討論房產收購事宜，隨後將尋求公衆就此事提供意見。

在獲得 Sound Transit 委員會授權後，Sound Transit 將開始按流程收購房產，包括以下步驟：

由獨立估價師進行估價以確定房產的公平市場價值，即一項資產在公開、競爭市場上的售價。
估價將由另一位估價師進行審查，以確保符合適當的方法及價值結論合理。
Sound Transit 準備報價文件包並郵寄至產權不動產擁有者手中以供審查及協商。一份估價單也提供給產權不動產擁有者也應提供一份估價單。
Sound Transit 協商收購房產。
Sound Transit 還將報銷以下部分或所有費用：
- 擁有者的自我估價
- 報價的法律審查
- 出於稅務目的的會計複核
產權不動產擁有者約見搬遷代理人以瞭解搬遷援助、資格和權利的相關資訊。

每項收購均獨立開展，大部份需時花費 6-12 個月才能完成。鑑於我們當前所掌握的資訊，房產收購與搬遷最快可能將於 2023 年下半年開始。時間表可能有所變更。

該項時間表如何受調整影響？

其他常見問題解答

問：由收購到銷售完結的平均時間長度是多久？
答：每一項收購均獨立展開，大部分程序需耗時 6 至 12 個月方可完成。

問：Sound Transit會否支付過戶結算費用？
答：Sound Transit將會支付一切正常的銷售費用，包含託管費、產權保險、提前還款罰金、抵押貸款手續費登記費以及一切與產權轉讓相關之典型費用。該項銷售免除不動產消費稅。

問：倘若本人之住宅被收購，而本人需要搬遷，本人能否繼續居於同一學區或購買類似住宅？
答：Sound Transit將全力為閣下尋找符合閣下需求之同類房產。

問：此次搬遷是否設有地理邊界限制？
答：沒有，閣下之搬遷範圍無任何位置限制。 Sound Transit 將支付 50 英里以內的搬遷費用。

問：倘若從收購至施工開始時有一段長時間延遲，在最近數年時間內，鄰近地方是否有空置房屋？
答：雖然收購與專案日程緊密相關，但在施工展開前，房屋可能已被清空。一旦發生這種狀況，Sound Transit將會採取適當措施保護這些房屋，直至可以拆除之時。

A Link light rail train travels over a roadway on an elevated track with Mt. Rainier in the background. — 我們目前在《環境影響報告草案》(Environmental Impact Statement, EIS) 中研備選方案案包括地下和高架軌道，如上述。

需要瞭解更多資訊吗？

如需瞭解物業收購及搬遷的更多資訊，請參閱下列資料：

參與項目

在《環境影響報告草案》諮詢期結束後，尚有許多機會可參與該項目。

出席CID公眾開放啟幕諮詢會

與Sound Transit、西雅圖市政府以及其他合作的機構夥伴一同於2022年10月13日在Union Station參與CID唐人街/國際區公眾開放啟幕諮詢會。了解項目的最新資訊，並且提供能夠幫助決定項目研究工作的範圍和方向，和未來數個月的公眾參與過程。。

與項目人員交談

要求與我們舉行簡報或會議；我們很高興與您或您的社區團體在網上會面，若情況允許，我們可進行面對面的簡報會。

保持聯絡

訂閱電子郵件更新資訊

在社交媒體上關注我們 @SoundTransit

聯絡我們

撥打項目專線 206-903-7229，與社區拓展人員交談。

如有問題、疑慮或意見，請寄送電子郵件至 wsblink@soundtransit.org

關於本項目

關於本項目

持續參與！

了解有關備選方案的更多資訊

環境評審期間的公平性和包容性

Interbay/Ballard 備選方案

Compare Interbay/Ballard Alternatives

South Interbay 備選方案

Compare South Interbay Alternatives

Downtown 備選方案

Compare Downtown Alternatives

Chinatown-International District 備選方案

Compare Chinatown-International District Alternatives

SODO 備選方案

Compare SODO Alternatives

Duwamish 備選方案

Compare Duwamish Alternatives

West Seattle Junction/Delridge 備選方案

Compare West Seattle Alternatives

我們該如何抵達此階段？

了解更多有關環境影響報告 (Environmental Impact Statement, EIS) 的資訊

想再看看《環境影響報告草案》嗎？

您在尋找快速概述嗎？

總覽

參與調查

我們從社區收集的意見

車站規劃進展報告

車站

概述

物業收購時間表

2021 年中 EIS 前期草案發佈

2022 年初* 環境影響報告草案發佈

2023 年* 最終 EIS 發佈

2023 年至 2027 年最終設計方案

常見問題解答

需要瞭解更多資訊吗？

出席CID公眾開放啟幕諮詢會

與項目人員交談

保持聯絡

聯絡我們